Young and Old Adults' Concerns About Morality and Competence

By Oscar Ybarra, Emily Chan, Denise C. Park. 2001

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/679e492cbb948916194e8d7d235d3040a41d12f3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In General Decision Sciences

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

On the importance of being moral: The Distinctive role of morality in social judgment (2014, background): “Accordingly, when forming impressions we are primarily interested in defining whether someone’s intentions are beneficial or harmful, and with respect to this, communion is more informative than agency (Cuddy et al., 2008; Ybarra et al., 2001).”
Life's recurring challenges and the fundamental dimensions: An integration and its implications for cultural differences and similarities (2008, background): “The research we reviewed earlier indicated that the C dimension is on top of people’s minds in terms of concepts accessible in memory ( Ybarra et al., 2001 ).”
The Paranoid Optimist: An Integrative Evolutionary Model of Cognitive Biases (2006, methodology): “In a similar vein, using the lexical decision paradigm , Ybarra, Chan, and Park (2001) found that adults were faster to identify trait words connoting interpersonal social costs (e.g., hostile, cruel, disloyal) than words connoting poor skill (e.g., stupid, weak, clumsy), or positive qualities…”
Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members☆ (2013, background): “Some researchers have conflated sociability and morality into the broader dimension of warmth (e.g., Cuddy et al., 2007; De Bruin & Van Lange, 1999, 2000; Fiske et al., 2002; Wojciszke, 2005; Ybarra et al., 2001).”
The bigger one of the "Big Two"? Preferential processing of communal information (2011, methodology): “For the analysis of response latencies we only included correct responses and response latencies up to 2s (cf. Ybarra et al., 2001).”
Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering (2011, background): “…we are primarily interested in defining whether someone’s intentions are beneficial or harmful, that is, whether they represent a material/psychological opportunity or a threat and, with respect to this, warmth is more informative than competence (Cuddy et al., 2008; Ybarra et al., 2001).”
Warmth and Competence As Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map (2008, background): “In lexical decision tasks, social perceivers identified warmth-related trait words faster than competence-related trait words, even when controlling for word length (Ybarra et al., 2001).”