Why Do You Regulate What You Eat? Relationships Between Forms of Regulation, Eating Behaviors, Sustained Dietary Behavior Change, and Psychological Adjustment

By L. Pelletier, Stéphanie C. Dion, Monika Slovinec-D'Angelo, R. Reid. 2004

376 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/679c23435207964dba6f0e9acf85d58ca521cd28

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Why we eat what we eat: the role of autonomous motivation in eating behaviour regulation (2011, background): “For instance, autonomous motivation for eating has been cross-sectionally associated with healthier eating patterns (Pelletier et al. 2004; Pelletier & Dion 2007).”
Successful behavior change in obesity interventions in adults: a systematic review of self-regulation mediators (2015, background): “Potential reasons for this association range from excessive psychological pressure leading to more rigid and inconsistent eating regulation [80-82] - poor body image being associated with a history of failed attempts and thus being a marker for other physiological, psychological, or socio-environmen”
Self-determination Theory and the psychology of exercise (2008, background): “Autonomous motivation is associated with exercise behavioural engagement and adherence over time (Chatzisarantis et al., 1997, 2002, 2003; Pelletier et al., 2004; Vansteenkiste et al., 2004; Fortier & Kowal, 2007), perceived competence (Goudas et al., 1994), exercise intentions (Hagger et al.,…”
Employees’ self-determined motivation, transformational leadership and work engagement (2019, background): “Amotivated individuals are known to lack intentions to perform their job (Ryan & Deci, 2000a), tend to feel incompetent and helpless (Pelletier et al., 2004), and are not likely to psychologically engage their work (Kahn, 1990).”
Understanding Public and Nonprofit Managers' Motivation Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory (2013, background): “A manager’s work SDI can be obtained if we multiply the mean of each motivational dimension by weights: SDI ¼ð3 intrinsicÞ þ ð1:5 identifiedÞ ð1 introjectedÞ ð2 externalÞ ð3 amotivatedÞ Researchers of educational psychology and generic behavioural science have used SDI to study various issues such a”