A systematic approach to conducting review studies: An assessment of content analysis in 25years of IB research

625 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A systematic literature review on the impact of artificial intelligence on workplace outcomes: A multi-process perspective (2021, positive): “…purpose of our review and the need to deliver results based on a systematic analysis of the literature in a bias-free manner (Tranfield et al., 2003), we employed multi-step qualitative coding as our analytical method (Danese, Manf ` e, & Romano, 2018; Stumbitz et al., 2018; Gaur & Kumar, 2018).”
Franchising research on emerging markets: Bibliometric and content analyses (2021, methodology): “Examples include systematic literature reviews, metaanalyses, bibliometric analyses, and content analyses (Apriliyanti & Alon, 2017; Gaur & Kumar, 2018; Maditati, Munim, Schramm, & Kummer, 2018; Zupic & Čater, 2015).”
Cultural intelligence, global mindset, and cross-cultural competencies: a systematic review using bibliometric methods (2020, methodology): “In NVivo, we performed an automatic count of keywords and used the word-tree function on the full publications (as a tool of computer-aided text analysis / CATA, see Gaur and Kumar, 2018).”
Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment (2021, methodology): “Beyond these, researchers often identify other study characteristics such as context, sample characteristics, sample size, method, research design, levels of analysis, and phenomena examined (Card, 2012; Gaur & Kumar, 2018).”