Learning to Think: Disciplinary Perspectives
By J. Donald. 2002
350 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6778606520fd9b50dbf1ee4cee64db91a8ae77ef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Elliot P. Douglas
- Ilana Krause
- Matthew J. Koehler
- Nathan McNeill
- Mirka Koro-Ljungberg
- Chris M. Golde
- Anna Jones
- David J. Therriault
Citations in the corpus
- Introducing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (2007, background): “Though these six processes apply to all disciplines, Donald (2002) shows that different disciplines emphasize certain processes and under-emphasize others.”
- Undergraduate Students' Beliefs about Engineering Problem Solving (2016, background): “Problem solving is considered to be a central activity of engineering practice (Donald, 2002; Sheppard, Macatangay, Colby, & Sullivan, 2009); workplace engineering problems are both complex and ill-structured (Jonassen, Strobel, & Lee, 2006; Yadav, Shaver, & Meckl, 2010; Yadav, Subedi, Lundeberg, &…”
- More than a signature: how advisor choice and advisor behaviour affect doctoral student satisfaction (2007, background): “Several authors, notably Tony Becher (Becher, 1989; Becher & Trowler, 2001) and Janet Donald (Donald, 2002), have outlined some of the differences in disciplinary cultures.”
- Generic Attributes in Accounting: The Significance of the Disciplinary Context (2010, background): “While there is a considerable body of work in this area (Becher, 1989; Becher and Trowler, 2001; Braxton and Hargens, 1996; Donald, 2002; Hativa and Marincovich, 1995; Kolb, 1985; Lattuca and Stark, 1994; Lenze, 1995; Lodahl and Gordon, 1972; Neumann et al., 2002; Smeby, 1996), this has been…”