Screening job applicants : The impact of physical attractiveness and application quality
By Lucy M. Watkins, Lucy Johnston. 2000
195 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/674810e25c4fbfc7c23913979ebc4acaa3cc96ee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Gender Studies
In Marketing
Citations in the corpus
- Why your stigma isn't hired : a dual-process framework of interview bias (2016, background): “…both overt cues (like candidate picture IDs or accent; Dipboye, Arvey, & Terpstra, 1977; Dipboye, Fromkin, & Wiback, 1975; Purkiss et al., 2006; Watkins & Johnston, 2000) and more subtle cues in ancillary information (like applicants' names and extracurricular activities in resumes; Derous &…”
- The Effect of Nonphysical Traits on the Perception of Physical Attractiveness: Three Naturalistic Studies (2004, background): “It is possible and even likely that physical attractiveness influences liking, familiarity, and respect in addition to the reverse (e.g., Langlois et al., 2000, Watkins & Johnston, 2000; Rhodes, Halberstadt, & Brajkovich, 2001; Zebrowitz & Lee, 1999).”
- The Labor Market Return to an Attractive Face: Evidence from a Field Experiment (2012, background): “Universidad de San Andrés”