Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions

By R. Turner, J. Paavola, Philip Cooper, S. Farber, Valma Jessamy, S. Georgiou. 2003

806 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/669105f58ff0ecaf57d620cd375cea006b94c0d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Institutional dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services: An analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programme (2009, background): “For this reason, it is argued that tailoring institutional arrangements to local property rights can be a determinant factor for an efficient andmore equitable capture of the benefits derived from ecosystem services (Turner et al., 2003, pp. 508).”
Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments (2006, background): “Some suggest that at ESMIN the demand curve would become infinitely elastic (see Turner et al. 2003), but as long as it is a (marginal) willingness to pay curve, this cannot strictly be correct since incomes and wealth would still be bounded.”
Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique (2011, background): “…is nowadays a ubiquitous institution for the satisfaction of large part of human needs and wants, and that consequently the couching of ecosystem services in economic terms is the best guarantee to their contemplation in public decisions (Pearce, 2000; Turner et al., 2003; Heal et al., 2005).”
Economic valuation of species loss in the open sea (2011, background): “Environmental valuation studies undertaken to date have tended to focus on terrestrial systems, whereas marine systems have received relatively little attention (Turner et al., 2003).”
Limits to CBA in UK and European environmental policy: retrospects and future prospects (2007, background): “There is a ‘primary’, ‘glue’ or ‘infrastructure’ value in nature which is a condition for the existence of other values (Green et al, 1994; Turner et al, 2003).”
Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism (2010, background): “…of one ecosystem service over others contributes to mask the relational aspects of such service with the broader ecosystem and, in addition, the managerial options promoted may also be counterproductive for the provision of the same or other ecosystem properties and functions (Turner et al., 2003).”
Multi-attributed environmental index construction (2006, background): “Human values associated with water resources are often classified as use and non-use values (Robin, 1998; Turner et al., 2003; Rolfe et al., 2000; Ferrara and Missios, 1998).”
Coastal and marine ecosystem services valuation for policy and management: Managed realignment case studies in England (2011, background): “This has in turn led to calls for an ecosystem services approach to support the case formore protected areas or bettermanagement and sustainable use of ecosystems under threat of conversion or degradation (Balmford et al., 2002; Bockstael et al., 2000; Costanza et al., 1997; Daily, 1997; Daily and E”
Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision (2010, background): “These characteristics influence the number and geographic distribution of the benefits and costs of the service, the feasibility of collective action and the level of transaction costs associated with providing the service (Daly and Farley, 2004; Hein et al., 2006; Turner et al., 2003; Ostrom, 2003)”
Valuing forest ecosystem services: What we know and what we don't (2013, background): “, the value of a small or discrete change in the provision of goods and services through, say, the loss or gain of an increment of forest cover (Pearce cited in SCBD, 2001; Turner et al., 2003).”
Ecosystem Services: Origins, Contributions, Pitfalls, and Alternatives (2013, methodology): “The mis-applications of conventional economic valuation in the ES literature have been pointed out in many reviews (Bockstael et al. 2000; Turner et al. 2003; Lele 2009).”
Ecosystem Services Provided by Birds (2008, background): “Additional sources include: Turner et al. (2003), Barbier (2007), Boyd (2007), Croitoru (2007), Kroeger and Casey (2007), and references therein.”