Economic valuation of species loss in the open sea

By Adriana Ressurreição, J. Gibbons, T. Dentinho, Michel J. Kaiser, Ricardo S. Santos, G. Edwards‐Jones. 2011

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Incorporating ecosystem services in marine planning: The role of valuation (2014, background): “Significant efforts have been made to estimate the value of coastal and marine ecosystem services (e.g., Barbier et al. 2011; Beaumont et al. 2008; Ghermandi and Nunes 2013; Liquete et al. 2013; Pendleton 1995; Sanchirico and Mumby 2009; Swartz, Sumaila, and Watson 2012; Ressurreicão et al. 2011; UN”
Stated preferences for tropical wildlife conservation amongst distant beneficiaries: Charisma, endemism, scope and substitution effects (2012, unknown): “Indeed, Ressurreição et al. (2011) and Veisten et al. (2004) find that local 'low profile' endangered species such as fish, algae, invertebrates, fungi, lichen and mosses may attract significant positive WTP.”
Twenty thousand sterling under the sea : Estimating the value of protecting deep-sea biodiversity (2014, methodology): “111 Most members of the general public also poorly understand complex ecological concepts such as 112 biodiversity (Christie et al., 2006; Ressurreição et al., 2011; Spash & Hanley, 1995; Turpie, 2003).”