Online Persuasion: How the Written Word Drives WOM
By Jin Li, Lingjing Zhan. Journal of Advertising Research, 2011
197 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6639d2beb0399b920545dfe5cdea6c4d7ae2978c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Trang P. Tran
- Nathalie Dens
- Patrick De Pelsmacker
- Matteo Borghi
- Marcello M. Mariani
- Matthew D. Rocklage
- R. Fazio
In Information Systems and Management
- Elvira R. Ismagilova
- Emma L. Slade
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Trang P. Tran
- Pradeep Racherla
- David C. Yen
- Nathalie Dens
- Patrick De Pelsmacker
In Sociology and Political Science
- Elvira R. Ismagilova
- Emma L. Slade
- Victoria D. Bush
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Trang P. Tran
- Pradeep Racherla
- David C. Yen
- Nathalia Purnawirawan
Citations in the corpus
- A study of factors that contribute to online review helpfulness (2015, background): “Additionally, reviewer qualifications and credibility that plague review quality (see Li & Zhan, 2011; Sotiriadis & van Zyl, 2013) are less of a concern for this group of users.”
- Perceived helpfulness of eWOM: Emotions, fairness and rationality (2020, background): “However, to date, research has tended to focus on positive discrete emotions and consequently understanding of the ways in which negative discrete emotions affect perceptions of online review helpfulness is limited (Li & Zhan, 2011).”
- What We Know and Don't Know about Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature (2014, background): “Li and Zhan (2011) have also found that reviews are most helpful when they are comprehensive and easy to read, communicate usage experience, provide argument support, are information positive, and possibly contain strong emotions.”
- Balance and Sequence in Online Reviews: How Perceived Usefulness Affects Attitudes and Intentions (2012, background): “…the perceived usefulness of single consumer reviews, including source credibility, product type, argumentation, valence and rating (extremity) (Cheung, Lee, and Rabjohn 2008; Forman, Ghose, and Wiesenfeld 2008; Li and Zhan 2011; Mudambi and Schuff 2010; Sen and Lerman 2007; Willemsen et al. 2011).”
- Keeping up with influencers: exploring the impact of social presence and parasocial interactions on Instagram (2021, unknown): “2012; Li and Zhan 2011).”