Constructs, methods, and measures for researching spirituality in organizations

By Dennis P. Heaton, Jane Schmidt-Wilk, F. Travis. 2004

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Health, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65ebc28012a4fb184f76c49bb2cf85e4a43eb564

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. G. McLean
2. Pawinee Petchsawang
3. Michaela Driver

In Health

1. G. McLean
2. Pawinee Petchsawang
3. Michaela Driver

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. G. McLean
2. Pawinee Petchsawang
3. Michaela Driver

Citations in the corpus

• From empty speech to full speech? Reconceptualizing spirituality in organizations based on a psychoanalytically-grounded understanding of the self (2005, background): “Specifically, conceptions of spirituality that are to result in the experience of a complete, integrated, aligned, balanced, whole and noncompartmentalized self (Biberman et al., 1999; Heaton et al., 2004; Kinjierski & Skrypnek, 2004; Milliman et al., 2003; Neal, 1999) must be examined as empty spee”
• Workplace spirituality, mindfulness meditation, and work engagement (2017, background): “Indeed, meditation now is widely accepted as a practice for increasing self-awareness (Heaton et al. 2004), and it is not necessarily related to any faith or religion; therefore, people from all religions, cultures, and backgrounds can practice meditation and be able to gain from its benefits…”