Firm clustering and innovation: Determinants and effects

By Leon A. G. Oerlemans, Marius T. H. Meeus, F. Boekema. 2001

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64db9937960988648dea9941d8e15ad7b52c4fe1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. David B. Audretsch
2. Mark Freel
3. M. Vivarelli
4. Roy Thurik
5. David Urbano
6. S. Roper
7. Robert Huggins
8. E. Stam

In Strategy and Management

1. David B. Audretsch
2. Mark Freel
3. Jeroen de Jong
4. P. Vermeulen
5. David Urbano
6. María Jesús Nieto
7. Lluís Santamaría
8. Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli

Citations in the corpus

• Patterns of Technological Innovation in Knowledge‐Intensive Business Services (2006, methodology): “In most survey research, error levels typically lie between 2 and 6 per cent with 95 per cent confidence limits (Oerlemans et al., 2001).”
• Innovation And Spatial Externalities (2003, background): “Audretsch and Feldman (1996); Almeida and Kogut (1997); Oerlemans, Meeus, and Boekema (2001); and Audretsch and Stephan (1996) linked the propensity for innovative activity to cluster together to industry-specific characteristics, most notably, the relative importance of knowledge spillovers.”
• What is evolutionary about ‘regional systems of innovation’? Implications for regional policy (2009, unknown): “Connected firms may not necessarily be co-located, and the influence of proximities other than physical (cognitive, organizational, social and institutional) may be at work (Freel 2003; Oerlemans et al. 2001; Boschma 2005).”