Evidence-based practice in psychology.

By B. Thorn. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2007

1,147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64ba44757a5998e97bbec58b1829cd83eefc082b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Theresa A. Gannon
2. Tony Ward
3. Judith R. Schore
4. Timothy B. Smith
5. Sara Cothren Cook
6. Luís Fernández-Ríos
7. D. Hodge
8. Bryan G. Cook

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Bryan G. Cook
2. Sara Cothren Cook
3. Judith R. Schore
4. Luís Fernández-Ríos
5. D. Hodge
6. Timothy B. Smith
7. Monica E. Carr
8. D. Moore

In General Psychology

1. Judith R. Schore
2. Sara Cothren Cook
3. Luís Fernández-Ríos
4. D. Hodge
5. Timothy B. Smith
6. Bryan G. Cook
7. B. Duncan
8. Tony Ward

Citations in the corpus

• Unraveling Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education (2013, background): “Inconsequential effects that do not have functional or pedagogical significance are insufficient for a practice to be identified as an EBP. Consequently, Gersten et al. (2005) required that EBPs demonstrate a weighted effect size significantly greater than zero across high and adequate quality studi”
• Standards for the preparation and writing of Psychology review articles (2009, background): “APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice (2006).”
• Self-Management Interventions on Students With Autism (2014, background): “The American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice (2006) developed a policy statement in which it defined evidence-based practice in psychology as “the integration of the best available research with clinical expertise in the context of patient characteristics”
• Psychological Treatments That Cause Harm (2007, background): “The issues here are not easily resolved and often require a consideration of client values and preferences in addition to scientific evidence (APA Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice, 2006).”
• The Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS): The Heart and Soul of Change Project (2012, methodology): “Anker et al. (2009) randomized couples seeking couples therapy (n 410) to PCOMS or TAU; therapists served as their own controls.”
• A Systematic Review of the Empirical Literature on Intercessory Prayer (2007, background): “Most practitioners, however, are likely to affirm the broader understanding of evidence-based practice articulated in the APA’s Presidential Task Force on Evidence-based Practice (2006). Such practitioners may believe that the best available evidence currently supports the use of intercessory prayer”