Modeling Anuran Detection and Site Occupancy on North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP) Routes in Maryland

By L. Weir, J. Andrew Royle, P. Nanjappa, R. E. Jung. 2009

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/646c5d5da2d8a0bad00b7e9dcf6545e7dafb2091

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. P. Taberlet
2. E. Bellemain
3. Andrea Wiggins
4. A. Valentini
5. S. Price
6. C. Miquel
7. A. Swanson
8. Susan C. Walls

In Ecology

1. P. Taberlet
2. E. Bellemain
3. A. Valentini
4. Tony Dejean
5. C. Miquel
6. C. Miaud
7. Margaret Kosmala
8. S. Price

In Global and Planetary Change

1. P. Taberlet
2. A. Valentini
3. S. Price
4. E. Bellemain
5. C. Miquel
6. Susan C. Walls
7. Tony Dejean
8. W. Barichivich

Citations in the corpus

• Auditory monitoring of anuran populations (2009, background): “Other factors, such as wind speed (Weir et al. 2005; Oseen and Wassersug 2002; Johnson and Batie 2001), humidity of air (Oseen and Wassersug 2002), barometric pressure (Oseen and Wassersug 2002), and moonlight (Weir et al.”
• Improved detection of an alien invasive species through environmental DNA barcoding: the example of the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus (2012, methodology): “Calling surveys are one of the most popular methods (e.g. Pellet & Schmidt 2005; de Solla et al. 2005; Weir et al. 2005), because male vocalizations to attract females are easily identifiable, making their detection and identification relatively simple when weather conditions are favourable (e.g.…”
• Assessing data quality in citizen science (preprint) (2016, background): “In anuran call surveys (Figure 2b), volunteers’ accuracy varied widely with species (Weir et al. 2005).”