Improved detection of an alien invasive species through environmental DNA barcoding: the example of the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus

By Tony Dejean, A. Valentini, C. Miquel, P. Taberlet, E. Bellemain, C. Miaud. 2012

567 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2662ac4ec68b3e35381c755fe143a1251fbb6b3e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Monitoring the near-extinct European weather loach in Denmark based on environmental DNA from water samples (2015, background): “…in species management improving detection probability have recently been demonstrated for the invasive American bullfrog ( Lithobates catesbeianus ) (Dejean et al., 2012), and the bighead carp ( Hypophthalmichthys nobilis ) and silver carp ( Hypophthalmichthys molitrix ) (Jerde et al., 2011, 2013).”
Quantifying effects of UV-B, temperature, and pH on eDNA degradation in aquatic microcosms (2015, background): “Degradation of DNA in water is considered a primary agent for reducing detectability over time (Dejean et al., 2012; Barnes et al., 2014; Pilliod et al., 2014), and thus limits the temporal and related spatial inference of eDNA detection results.”
Quantifying relative fish abundance with eDNA: a promising tool for fisheries management (2016, methodology): “The popularity of this method to assess presence/absence is growing fast and expectation of using species inventories collected via eDNA instead of traditional sampling methods is gaining broad interest (Jerde et al. 2011, 2013; Dejean et al. 2012; Thomsen et al. 2012a; Mahon et al. 2013; Pilliod et”
Environmental DNA as a new method for early detection of New Zealand mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) (2013, methodology): “A field application of an eDNA test for the invasive American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) has demonstrated the high level of sensitivity of this method over standard field methods for detection of this species in ponds (Dejean et al. 2012).”
Replication levels, false presences and the estimation of the presence/absence from eDNA metabarcoding data (2015, background): “amphibian calls, electroshocking and pit traps) (Dejean et al. 2012; Tr eguier et al. 2014).”
Environmental DNA surveillance for invertebrate species: advantages and technical limitations to detect invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in freshwater ponds. (2014, background): “Successful detection is reported in more than 80% of cases when collecting only three samples of water (45 mL in total) per pond (Ficetola et al. 2008; Dejean et al. 2012; Thomsen et al. 2012a).”
Taxonomic and geographical representation of freshwater environmental DNA research in aquatic conservation (2019, methodology): “Because of the high sensitivity, and subsequently the possibility to detect low individual abundances, or even single individuals, eDNA techniques are increasingly suggested and used as an important tool to monitor biological invasions (Darling & Mahon, 2011; Dejean et al., 2012; Egan et al., 2015).”
Tackling Invasive Alien Species in Europe: the Top 20 Issues (2014, methodology): “Journal compilation © 2014 REABIC Open Access Viewpoint Tackling Invasive Alien Species in Europe: the Top 20 Issues Joe M. Caffrey1*, Jan-Robert Baars2, Jenny H. Barbour3, Pieter Boets4, Philip Boon5, Keith Davenport6, Jaimie T.A. Dick3, John Early7, Lennart Edsman8, Cathal Gallagher1, Jackson Gros”
REVIEW: The detection of aquatic animal species using environmental DNA – a review of eDNA as a survey tool in ecology (2014, background): “Multiple species have been the focus of study and include amphibians (Ficetola et al. 2008; Goldberg et al. 2011; Dejean et al. 2012; Olson, Briggler & Williams 2012; Thomsen et al. 2012b; Pilliod et al. 2013, 2014), fishes (Dejean et al.”
Assessing the cost‐efficiency of environmental DNA sampling (2016, unknown): “trapping, visual surveys) indicate that eDNA sampling can achieve superior detection rates in aquatic systems (Ficetola et al. 2008; Jerde et al. 2011; Dejean et al. 2012; Smart et al. 2015), yet there has been little discussion of the cost-efficiency of eDNA sampling relative to traditional methods”
Particle size distribution and optimal capture of aqueous macrobial eDNA (2014, background): “The heterogeneous distribution of macrobial eDNA among replicate water samples observed in this study (Figure 2) and others (Jerde et al. 2011; Dejean et al. 2012; Thomsen et al. 2012a; Pilliod et al. 2013), suggests an extensive search mode (i.e., large pore size and large water volume) as the…”
How will the ‘molecular revolution’ contribute to biological recording? (2015, methodology): “American bullfrog, (Rana catesbeiana) Ponds Detection of IAS Standard PCR Ficetola, Bonin, & Miaud, 2008; Dejean et al., 2012 Great crested newt (Triturus cristatus) Ponds Monitoring biodiversity qPCR Thomsen et al., 2012b; Biggs et al., 2014 Fish Goldfish (Carassius auratus) Bait shop tanks…”