Auditory monitoring of anuran populations

By M. Dorcas, S. Price, Susan C. Walls, W. Barichivich. 2009

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91164edae2126fbfb4651f2c2f47a4d09de70d14

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Oscar
2. Ospina
3. Luís
4. Villanueva
5. Rivera
6. Carlos
7. C. Steelman
8. Corrada

Citations in the corpus

• Anuran Calling Survey Optimization: Developing and Testing Predictive Models of Anuran Calling Activity (2010, background): “…Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP; Weir and Mossman, 2005) and Frogwatch USA (available online; ,http:// www.nwf.org/frogwatchUSA/.) use manual calling surveys (i.e., observer-based calling surveys) to assess anuran populations (Bishop et al., 1997; Lepage et al., 1997; Dorcas et al., 2009).”
• Variable response of anuran calling activity to daily precipitation and temperature: implications for climate change (2013, methodology): “An alternative methodology, Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM), could help to produce long-term datasets with hourly or sub-hourly monitoring of frog populations and assemblages (e.g., Bridges and Dorcas 2000, Dorcas et al. 2009, Steelman and Dorcas 2010).”