Assessing data quality in citizen science (preprint)
By Margaret Kosmala, Andrea Wiggins, A. Swanson, Brooke D. Simmons. bioRxiv, 2016
823 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Ecological and environmental citizen science projects have enormous potential to advance science, influence policy, and guide resource management by producing datasets that are otherwise infeasible to generate. This potential can only be realized, though, if the datasets are of high quality. While scientists are often skeptical of the ability of unpaid volunteers to produce accurate datasets, a growing body of publications clearly shows that diverse types of citizen science projects can produce data with accuracy equal to or surpassing that of professionals. Successful projects rely on a suite of methods to boost data accuracy and account for bias, including iterative project development, volunteer training and testing, expert validation, replication across volunteers, and statistical modeling of systematic error. Each citizen science dataset should therefore be judged individually, according to project design and application, rather than assumed to be substandard simply because volunteers generated it.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee013b1477e8f81cb5c66a9a93a342281f740042
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Wouter A. Dorigo
- Alexander Gruber
- Wolfgang Wagner
- Irene Himmelbauer
- Daniel Aberer
- H. Bogena
- L. Brocca
- Lukas Schremmer
Citations in the corpus
- The International Soil Moisture Network: serving Earth system science for over a decade (2021, background): “Overall, it has been shown that well-organised citizen science projects can provide trustworthy contributions to the scientific community (Kosmala et al., 2016; Palmer et al., 2017).”