Taking Stock of Corporate Governance Research While Looking to the Future

By Igor Filatotchev, Brian K. Boyd. 2009

189 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63c6973c713f7a7a1ee453b18b5b6198fcf4f52f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Substitutes or Complements? A Configurational Examination of Corporate Governance Mechanisms (2014, background): “Yet despite these and other calls for corporate governance research to take a more holistic approach (Dalton et al., 2003; Filatotchev & Boyd, 2009: 258; Tosi, 2008), we still know little of how governance mechanisms operate together to afford firm profitability.”
The research frontier in corporate governance (2011, background): “However, the agency perspective with its exclusive focus on shareholders is increasingly seen as overly narrow since it does not take account of other stakeholders who may have different interests ( Filatotchev and Boyd 2009 ).”
Corporate Boards and Ownership Structure as Antecedents of Corporate Governance Disclosure in Saudi Arabian Publicly Listed Corporations (2018, background): “Keywords: corporate governance, board and ownership structures, voluntary disclosure regime, multitheory, Saudi Arabia”
Voluntary Corporate Governance Disclosures by Post-Apartheid South African Corporations (2012, unknown): “Recent decades have witnessed a proliferating interest in corporate governance (CG) (Collett and Hrasky, 2005; Filatotchev and Boyd, 2009), following well-publicised cases of major corporate scandals and failures in developed countries, which were attributed mainly to poor CG practices (Cadbury…”
Good corporate governance in Nigeria: Antecedents, propositions and peculiarities (2015, methodology): “In particular, relying on an alternative theoretical framework (i.e. institutional theory) rather than the dominant agency framework (e.g., Filatotchev & Boyd, 2009; Van Eves et al., 2009; GomezMeijia & Wiseman, 2012), discussions offer new theoretical and empirical insights.”
Complementary or Substitutive Effects? Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Corporate Social Responsibility (2018, background): “Presumably, multiple governance mechanisms interactively influence organizational outcomes (Aguilera, Desender, & Kabbach de Castro, 2012; Filatotchev & Boyd, 2009; Misangyi & Acharya, 2014) in a complex way.”
Corporate environmental disclosure and earnings management—The moderating role of corporate governance structures (2021, background): “…so, managers may attempt to mitigate any potential penalties and try to compensate stakeholders by publishing information related to their environmental responsibility performance accompanied by reliable earnings figures as a policy to be perceived as ethically responsible (Gargouri et al., 2010).”
The Relative Value Relevance of Shareholder Versus Stakeholder Corporate Governance Disclosure Policy Reforms in South Africa (2012, unknown): “University of Huddersfield Repository Ntim, Collins G., Opong, Kwaku K. and Danbolt, Jo”
The Impact of Corporate Governance on IFRS Adoption Choices (2013, background): “In contrast to the ‘one-size-fits-all approach’, they propose a conceptual framework that features greater attention to the organisational context to explain the existence and the effectiveness of corporate governance mechanisms aimed at curbing agency costs (see also in Filatotchev and Boyd, 2009).”
Toward a Theory of Public Entrepreneurship (2010, background): “So does the similar explosion of interest in corporate social responsibility (McWilliams et al., 2006; Filatotchev and Boyd, 2009; Judge, 2009).”