"Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex.

By Risto Näätänen, Mari Tervaniemi, Elyse S. Sussman, Petri Paavilainen, István Winkler. Trends in Neurosciences, 2001

838 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/639ad8327628bce0da9ef22428bc01ec3ac58f6a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A Hierarchy of Responses to Auditory Regularities in the Macaque Brain (2014, neutral): “Local deviants systematically elicit a mismatch response in auditory cortex (Näätänen et al., 2001; Winkler et al., 2009), whereas global deviants, in humans, evoke a P3b response, associated in fMRI to a broad prefrontoparietal network.”
Synaptic plasticity and dysconnection in schizophrenia. (2006, background): “It is also elicited when temporal (interstimulus intervals) or higher-order features (patterns) are changed, suggesting that memory traces about regularities of stimulus-to-stimulus relationships are encoded (Näätänen et al 2001).”
Brain mechanisms linking language and action (2005, background): “Magnetoencephalography (MEG) results showed that an early brain response, the mismatch negativit”
Action understanding and active inference (2011, neutral): “…function is shown in c. Interestingly, there is a slight phase shift suggesting that under action the activity of this unit occurs slightly later (about 4–8 ms) (e.g. the N1, Mangun and Hillyard 1991; the mismatch negativity , Näätänen et al. (2001) and the P3, Donchin and Coles (1988)).”
Prediction, Cognition and the Brain (2009, background): “On the other hand, second-order or even higher-order (contingency) rules (Näätanen et al., 2001; Shanks, 2007) which require the extraction of relations between specifi c, mutually noninterchangeable stimuli can underlie expectations related to more complex events, even those which were previously n”
Phonetic Perception and the Temporal Cortex (2002, background): “Examples of this are the frequency of pure tones, the spectrotemporal structure of sound patterns, and the timbre of instrumental sounds (Tervaniemi et al., 1994, 1999, 2000a,c; Naatanen et al., 1993, 2001; Alho et al., 1996; Tervaniemi, 2001).”
The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms (2009, background): “Given its automatic nature, the MMN might be associated with preattentive cognitive operations in audition and, for this reason, it has been suggested that it reflects 'primitive intelligence' in the auditory cortex (Näätänen et al., 2001).”
Multiple Time Scales of Adaptation in Auditory Cortex Neurons (2004, methodology): “This sensitivity can also be used for optimizing the coding of sounds by matching the neuronal firing to the stimulus statistics (Brenner et al., 2000; Fairhall et al., 2001) and for forming a sensory memory trace that may capture the complexity of past auditory stimulation (Näätänen et al., 2001).”
Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities (2009, background): “All 15 electrodes were located in the lateral part of the temporal cortex and most of them within the STG [Broadman Area (BA) 22], in agreement with previous reports of MMN generators (4).”
A Dual Role for Prediction Error in Associative Learning (2008, neutral): “A good example of this notion is given by the mismatch negativity (MMN), the difference between the event-related potential to an unexpected ‘‘deviant’’ and predictable ‘‘standard’’ stimuli (Naatanen et al. 2001).”