Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences
By C. Teddlie, A. Tashakkori. 2008
3,637 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6356a5c0a4c4edc93f39f623026d389fafdc9752
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Mieke Heyvaert
- Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie
- José F. Molina-Azorίn
- Michael R. Harwell
- R. Burke Johnson
- B. Maes
- Judith Schoonenboom
- K. Hannes
Citations in the corpus
- Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion on its Types, Challenges, and Criticisms (2021, background): “…a more complete picture and provides an opportunity for a greater assortment of divergent or complementary views; which are valuable as they not only lead to extra reflection and enrich our understanding of a phenomenon, but also open new avenues for future inquiries (Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2009).”
- How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design (2017, methodology): “A typology serves several purposes, including the following: guiding practice, legitimizing the field, generating new possibilities, and serving as a useful pedagogical tool (Teddlie and Tashakkori 2009).”
- Critical Appraisal of Mixed Methods Studies (2013, methodology): “Again introducing a distinct terminology, with respect to criteria on interpretations, conclusions, inferences, and implications of the research, Teddlie and Tashakkori (2009) refer to interpretive rigor and inference transferability.”
- Procedural justice in contacts with the police: testing a relational model of authority in a mixed methods study (2011, unknown): “…is a relatively new development in the field of social and behavioral sciences and has emerged as an alternative to the traditional dichotomy of qualitative and quantitative methods in an attempt to overcome limitations of both approaches when applied independently (Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2009).”
- The Use and Added Value of Mixed Methods in Management Research (2011, background): “Teddlie and Tashakkori (2003, 2009) examined the utility of mixed methods research, stating that mixed methods are useful if they provide better opportunities for answering research questions.”
- Disentangling accent from comprehensibility (2012, background): “Finally, all coded comments were “quantitized” by tabulating frequency counts for each category (Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2009).”
- Beyond Words: Using Nonverbal Communication Data in Research to Enhance Thick Description and Interpretation (2013, methodology): “…multiple approaches to answering research questions expand the choices of the researcher (Johnson & Christensen, 2010; Johnson & Onwuegbuzie, 2004; Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2009), the combination of quantitative and qualitative research elements was adopted for this case study—specifically, what is…”
- COVID-19, frontline hotel employees’ perceived job insecurity and emotional exhaustion: Does trade union support matter? (2021, methodology): “As recommended, for an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, the participants in the qualitative phase should be those who participated in the quantitative phase (Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2009).”
- Motivating Factors for Adult Learners in Higher Education. (2014, background): “…of this design is that the strengths of one form of data collection offset the weaknesses of the other form, provides the ease of triangulation of data sources, and consequently enhances the credibility of the findings (Creswell, 2008; Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011; Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2008).”
- Teacher Professionalism and Professional Development Practices in South Sulawesi, Indonesia (2014, background): “The integration helps to achieve rigorous interpretation and to ensure the consistency of both strands (Teddlie and Tashakkori, 2009).”