Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management.

By M. Reed, Anil Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, Klaus Hubacek, Joe Morris, C. Prell, Claire H. Quinn, Lindsay C. Stringer. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009

2,636 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/366ca3bddf51eb535aa47f980e050271efaf3956

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Participatory Scenario Planning for Protected Areas Management under the Ecosystem Services Framework: the Doñana Social-Ecological System in Southwestern Spain (2011, methodology): “To avoid selection bias or the marginalization of important stakeholder groups, an analysis of the social actors is recommended instead of an ad hoc selection (Reed et al. 2009).”
Does public awareness increase support for invasive species management? Promising evidence across taxa and landscape types (2017, background): “…decision makers and researchers increasingly recognize the need to consider the social dimensions of invasive species management (e.g. Stokes et al. 2006; Garcı́a-Llorente et al. 2008; Reed et al. 2009; Kueffer 2010; Sharp et al. 2011; Moon et al. 2015; Novoa et al. 2016a; Woodford et al. 2016).”
How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands (2014, background): “Ecology and Society 21(2): 24 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss2/art24/ In line with the literature (Newig and Fritsch 2009a, Reed et al. 2009, Stanghellini 2010), our results suggest that participant selection strongly determines the outcomes of a participatory process.”
The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling (2012, background): “But how are the stakeholders identified in the first place (Reed et al., 2009)? It depends on the problem.”
Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job (2018, background): “The level of engagement differs across stakeholders and varies from one stage of the project to another (Arnstein, 1969; Hurlbert and Gupta, 2015; Reed et al., 2009).”
European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review (2013, methodology): “Other methods important to understanding the roles of different agents in landscape management and landscape policies include social network analysis and the mapping of actor networks (Reed et al. 2009; Ortolani et al. 2010).”
Equity, Power Games, and Legitimacy: Dilemmas of Participatory Natural Resource Management (2013, background): “" This is what Ribot (2001) calls a lack of downwards accountability of leaders.”
Stakeholder mapping for the governance of biosecurity: a literature review (2015, background): “For this reason, Reed et al. (2009) proposed the use of ‘extendable matrices’ that consider levels of interest and influence, but attempt to characterise the nature of those interests and to document reasons for the level of influence that is ascribed (e.g. considering whether a stakeholder holds…”