Blue frontiers: managing the environmental costs of aquaculture

By S. Hall, A. Delaporte, M. Phillips, M. Beveridge, M. O'Keefe. 2011

218 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62e32c2783775180420fe66805558c14ef21c254

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Can marine fisheries and aquaculture meet fish demand from a growing human population in a changing climate (2012, background): “Recent reviews of successful governance reform in fisheries (Costello et al., 2008; Gutierrez et al., 2011) and of improving environmental standards in aquaculture (Hall et al., 2010) give reasons for hope.”
The decline of mussel aquaculture in the European Union: causes, economic impacts and opportunities (2020, background): “Hall et al. (2011) highlighted mussel farming as one of the least impactful methods to produce animal-source food, across a range of global/regional environmental indicators (eutrophication, acidification, climate change, space use, energy demand, biotic depletion).”
Food security and the Coral Triangle Initiative (2013, background): “Aquaculture is increasingly recognised as essential to meeting the future food security demands of the region [62–64].”
Collateral diseases: Aquaculture impacts on wildlife infections (2020, background): “…ensuring the environmental sustainability of fu - ture growth constitutes one of the main challenges for aquaculture (Barrett et al., 2019; Beveridge et al., 1994; Campbell et al., 2019; Costello et al., 2019; Diana, 2009; Hall et al., 2011; Subasinghe et al., 2019; Subasinghe et al., 2009).”
The Political Economics of Marine Aquaculture in the United States (2016, background): “Environmental concerns raised by aquaculture include excess waste discharge, disease transfer or genetic effects on wild stocks, and interactions with marine mammals (Duarte et al., 2009, Hall et al., 2011).”
Feeding 9 billion by 2050 – Putting fish back on the menu (2015, background): “…in the fisheries and aquaculture communities who have been relentlessly advocating for fish as an entry point in this debate (see e.g., Béné et al. 2007; Hall et al. 2011; Thilsted 2012), but to the vast majority of the international experts who are influencing the wider debate and policies on FSN.”
Aquatic food security: insights into challenges and solutions from an analysis of interactions between fisheries, aquaculture, food safety, human health, fish and human welfare, economy and environment (2016, methodology): “efforts to understand the interactions between parts of the food system, such as the trade-offs between the risks and health benefits of fish consumption (EFSA 2015) and the relative environmental impacts of different types of fish production (Hall et al. 2011), the generally disparate treatment of ”
Shifting Diets for a Sustainable Food Future (2016, methodology): “Informed by FAO (2004) and Hall et al. (2011a), this scenario assumes that an obese person on average consumes 500 more calories per day than a person eating the average daily energy requirement, and that each overweight person on average consumes 250 more calories per day than the average daily…”
The Carbon Footprint of Norwegian Seafood Products on the Global Seafood Market (2013, background): “…Norway was in line with previous findings, despite the fact that a slightly different methodology was used and key data were much more detailed than prior studies (Ellingsen et al. 2009; Hall et al. 2011) and were obtained from different sources than in the work of Pelletier and colleagues (2009).”
Habitat value of bivalve shellfish and seaweed aquaculture for fish and invertebrates: Pathways, synthesis and next steps (2021, background): “92 Reducing negative impacts to achieve greater sustainability is a recurring challenge, but also an opportunity for innovation.”
Fisheries in transition: Food and nutrition security implications for the global South (2014, background): “These trends have resulted in policy narratives which position capture fisheries as ‘doomed’, or subject to ‘inevitable decline’ (Friend et al., 2009), and emphasize that ‘any increase in demand for fish can only be met by aquaculture’ (Hall et al., 2011, p52).”
Climate change impacts on fisheries in West Africa: implications for economic, food and nutritional security (2012, background): “Although aquaculture production in Africa is growing fast, it will not be able to fill the gap between fish supply and demand over the next decade (Hall et al. 2011).”
A Revolution Without People? Closing the People-Policy Gap in Aquaculture Development (2015, background): “Reports such as the ―Blue Frontiers‖ by Hall et al. 2011 that aim to inform policy makers about the impacts of aquaculture on the environment and to stimulate debate on the optional animal food production systems for tomorrow are a case in point.”
Sustainable Intensification of Aquaculture through Nutrient Recycling and Circular Economies: More Fish, Less Waste, Blue Growth (2021, background): “…a more resource-efficient approach (Miller et al. 2008; Nichols et al. 2010; Tlusty and Thorsen 2017; Stevens et al. 2018) and minimize aquaculture waste (Hall et al. 2011; Castine, McKinnon, et al. 2013; Castine, Paul, et al. 2013; Newton et al. 2014; Dauda et al. 2019; Turchini et al. 2019).”