Secrecy versus patenting

By K. Kultti, T. Takalo, Juuso Toikka. 2007

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62d7b0a370986f0cf5a7de7631aed0440911f8ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Sharon D. James
2. Shaohua Lu
3. Michael J. Leiblein

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Sharon D. James
2. Shaohua Lu
3. Michael J. Leiblein
4. Anne Parmigiani

Citations in the corpus

• Appropriability mechanisms, innovation, and productivity: evidence from the UK (2014, unknown): “…it has to do so in such a way that the social costs associated with the creation of a (possibly short-term) legal monopoly are minimised while not hindering the diffusion of the newly created knowledge across the economic system (Levin et al. 1987; Gallini 2002; Kultti, Takalo, and Toikka 2007).”
• Contracting Over the Disclosure of Scientific Knowledge: Intellectual Property and Academic Publication (2017, unknown): “(Rosenberg, 1990, p.169) 4 See, for example, Mansfield (1985), Denicolo & Franzoni (2004); Bessen (2005), Erkal (2005) and Kultti et al. (2007).”
• How Firms Capture Value From Their Innovations (2013, background): “Similarly, Kultti et al. (2007) emphasized that keeping innovations secret versus patenting them is more costly when a firm operates in a competitive technology space.”