Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke.

By Friedhelm Christoph Hummel, Pablo A. Celnik, P. Giraux, A. Floel, Wanyi Wu, C. Gerloff, Leonardo G. Cohen. Brain : a journal of neurology, 2005

1,144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Neurology, Rehabilitation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62159e4f9ead350c00c569d937482010c9a49e74

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Agnes Flöel
2. Michael A. Nitsche
3. Alvaro Pascual-Leone
4. Walter Paulus
5. Felipe Fregni
6. John C. Rothwell
7. Leonardo G. Cohen

In Neurology

1. Michael A. Nitsche
2. Agnes Flöel
3. Alvaro Pascual-Leone
4. Leonardo G. Cohen
5. Walter Paulus
6. Felipe Fregni
7. John C. Rothwell
8. Friedhelm Christoph Hummel

In Rehabilitation

1. Felipe Fregni
2. Alvaro Pascual-Leone
3. Pablo A. Celnik
4. Michael A. Nitsche
5. Leonardo G. Cohen
6. Agnes Flöel

Citations in the corpus

• How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? (2005, background): “Due to its conditioning effects, tDCS holds promise as a means of studying human brain function (Lang et al., 2004b; Siebner et al., 2004) and improving impaired brain function in neuropsychiatric diseases, e.g. in stroke (Hummel et al., 2005).”
• A sham‐controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury (2006, methodology): “, 2005) and promote the recovery of motor deficits in stroke patients (Fregni et al., 2005a; Hummel et al., 2005).”
• tDCS-enhanced motor and cognitive function in neurological diseases (2014, neutral): “However, note that this study did not apply a specific training in parallel to stimulation, and also did not verify that patients included into the study had an intact M1 (Fregni et al., 2005; Hummel et al., 2005).”
• Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: A basis for high-definition tDCS (2013, background): “…is thought to alter the tone of neuronal excitability. tDCS induces lasting biological effects (Edwards et al., 2009; Nitsche and Paulus, 2001) and is being currently explored to treat a range of neuropsychiatric disorders and facilitate rehabilitation, including after stroke (Hummel et al., 2005).”
• Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study (2007, methodology): “In fact, the two clinical tDCS stroke studies used different electrodes size, 5×5 cm(2) (Hummel et al., 2005)and 5×7 cm(2) (Fregni et al.”
• Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: Potential implications for motor learning (2010, neutral): “…modulatory effect on cognitive functions and motor behavior in healthy subjects and patients with neuropsychiatric diseases (Ferrucci et al., 2008; Hummel et al., 2005; 198 Neuron 66, 198–204, April 29, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Inc. Nitsche et al., 2003a; Reis et al., 2009; Wassermann and Grafman,…”
• Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. (2007, background): “…relevant because they modify perception as well as cognition in healthy subjects (Antal et al. 2001, 2004a,b,c; Matsunaga et al. 2004; Nitsche et al. 2003) and were shown to improve clinical symptoms in patients with neuropsychiatric diseases (Fregni et al. 2005b, 2006a,b,c; Hummel et al. 2005).”
• Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. (2006, background): “…2005b). tDCS can be applied continuously and safely for up to 30 min (Hummel et al., 2005a; Iyer et al., 2005; Nitsche et al., 2005), close to the typical duration of a session of rehabilitative treatment, and can be administered in synchrony with motor training protocols (Hummel et al., 2005a).”
• Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke (2005, background): “Consistent with this view, it has been proposed that enhancing activity in the affected hemisphere using noninvasive brain polarization (Hummel and Cohen, 2005; Hummel et al., 2005) and/or decreasing excitability in the intact hemisphere using TMS (Mansur et al.”
• Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Improves Language Learning (2008, background): “Subjects’ blood pressure, heart rate, as well as their mood ratings, were comparable across sessions, a finding consistent with previous tDCS reports (Hummel et al., 2005; Nitsche, Schauenburg, et al., 2003).”
• Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. (2006, background): “Priming the ipsilesional cortex, as an adjuvant therapy, may improve functional outcomes in this group (Stefan et al., 2000; Stinear and Byblow, 2004b; Fregni et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2005; Hummel et al., 2005; Khedr et al., 2005; Mansur et al., 2005; Takeuchi et al., 2005; Smith and Staines, 200”
• Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. (2008, background): “Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the affected hemisphere in humans with unilateral stroke has been found to result in transient improvements in motor function (Hummel et al., 2005).”