A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes

By J. de Houwer, J. Musch, Karl Christoph Klauer. 2003

274 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61f55f52a14610a5bda8162f69df7d73ead99085

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures (2005, background): “These measures—most of them based on reaction times in response compatibility tasks (cf. De Houwer, 2003)—are intended to assess relatively automatic mental associations that are difficult to gauge with explicit self-report measures.”
On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect (2003, background): “…researchers have pointed out that the difference in performance on congruent and incongruent trials can result either from differences in stimulus–response compatibility (SRC) or from differences in stimulus– stimulus compatibility (SSC; e.g., De Houwer, 2003; Kornblum, Hasbroucq, & Osman, 1990).”
The implicit association test outperforms the extrinsic affective Simon task as an implicit measure of inter-individual differences in attitudes. (2007, methodology): “However, De Houwer (2003b) did not present data that supported the claim that the EAST can provide a valid and reliable measure of inter-individual differences in attitudes.”
A First Test of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a Measure of Self-Esteem: Irish Prisoner Groups and University Students (2009, methodology): “Numerous methodologies have been developed that aim to provide measures of such cognitions, including evaluative priming procedures, the Implicit Association Test (IAT), the Go/No Go Association Test (GNAT), and the Extrinsic Affective Simon Test (EAST; De Houwer, 2003, 2008, for reviews).”
The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a Measure of Implicit Relative Preferences: A First Study (2009, unknown): “In providing a structural analysis of the IAT, De Houwer (2003a) argued that the test involves manipulating relevant and irrelevant stimulus response (S-R) compatibility.1 For present purposes we will focus only on the former manipulation because De Houwer also concluded that it is primarily…”
Does crossmodal correspondence modulate the facilitatory effect of auditory cues on visual search? (2012, methodology): “…between pitch and brightness, we conducted a simplified version of the Implicit Association Test (Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998), a method that is thought to assess stimulus–response compatibility (De Houwer, 2003), with low and high tones and black and white circles as the stimuli.”
Ten Frequently Asked Questions About Implicit Measures and Their Frequently Supposed, But Not Entirely Correct Answers (2009, background): “Second, different implicit measures employ different kinds of mechanisms to assess mental associations (De Houwer, 2003b).”
A functional-cognitive framework for attitude research (2013, background): “As discussed in more detail by De Houwer (2007), defining EC in this manner restricts theoretical ideas about EC to those that refer to automatic association formation.”