Enterprise Systems Success: A Measurement Model

By Guy G. Gable, Darshana Sedera, Taizan Chan. International Conference on Interaction Sciences, 2003

426 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61601e12ea936c1795bf5b970ee0be6edd8e497c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Participation in Development and Implementation - Updating An Old, Tired Concept for Today's IS Contexts (2004, background): “Since the early days of the IS field, the concept of system success has been the subject of much research addressing its definition, components, relationships among components, and measurement in a variety of contexts, such as ERP system installation (DeLone and McLean, 1992; Gable et al., 2003; Sed”
Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation (2007, methodology): “Areview of the literature on IS success, IS performance, web success, e-learner satisfaction, user information satisfaction, end-user computing satisfaction, web user satisfaction, system use, IS service quality, web quality, and organizational benefits [1] [3] [4] [9][14][15] [16][17][18][20][26][3”
A Factor and Structural Equation analysis of the Enterprise Systems Success Measurement Model (2004, methodology): “21See the discussion in Gable et al. 2003.”
The Updated DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success (2012, background): “Ease of learning Gable et al. (2008), Sedera and Gable (2004b)”
Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships (2008, background): “Therefore, this review also discusses the specific success measures that were used in the selected studies.”
Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female (2020, background): “Many studies suggested to add the new dimensions of D&M model, and some have recommended to include the such as “service quality,” “workgroup impact,” “consultant/vendor quality” in the D & M model (Gable et al. 2003; Ifinedo 2006).”
Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model (2008, result): “This paper consolidates and extends earlier work of the authors (Gable et al., 2003, Sedera and Gable, 2004) by reconceptualizing IS Success as a multidimensional phenomenon.”
Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality (2010, background): “, 2002; Gable et al., 2003). Seddon (1997) points out the difficulties with the D&M success model with reference to the meaning of the use construct.”