Anonymous Communication Policies for the Internet: Results and Recommendations of the AAAS Conference

By A. Teich, M. Frankel, Rob Kling, Ya-Ching Lee. 1999

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Riffle (2016, background): “The right to remain anonymous is a fundamental right in a democratic society and is crucial for freedom of speech [49].”
Proactively Accountable Anonymous Messaging in Verdict (2012, background): “A right to anonymity is fundamental to democratic culture, freedom of speech [3, 46], peaceful resistance to repression [39], and protecting minority rights [45].”
Riposte: An Anonymous Messaging System Handling Millions of Users (2015, background): “Consider, for example, a government employee who wants to anonymously leak evidence of waste, fraud, or incompetence to the public.”
Information privacy and correlates: an empirical attempt to bridge and distinguish privacy-related concepts (2013, methodology): “Anonymity was measured by three items developed from Teich et al (1999) and secrecy was measured by three items adapted from Bok (1989) and Tefft (1980).”
Dissent: accountable anonymous group messaging (2010, background): “The limited form of anonymity the Internet provides is a widely cherished feature [37, 41], enabling people and groups”
The Social Cost of Cheap Pseudonyms (2001, background): “The consensus of a AAAS sponsored conference, as reported by Teich et al (1999), was that the tradeoffs should sometimes be resolved in favor of anonymity and thus that regulatory regimes should strive to preserve the possibility of anonymity.”
Dissent in Numbers: Making Strong Anonymity Scale (2012, unknown): ““Anonymous Communication Should Be Regarded as a Strong Human Right; In the United States It Is Also a Constitutional Right” [56]”