Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke

By Nagako Murase, J. Duque, R. Mazzocchio, Leonardo G. Cohen. Annals of Neurology, 2004

1,502 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/614cdd4f8ecc01ce8ef5af2daa8ba14ca094247c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Neurology

Citations in the corpus

Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke (2005, methodology): “04) on premovement IHIc, a result consistent with our previous study (Murase et al., 2004).”
Brain-computer interfaces in medicine. (2012, background): “The hypothesis s that BCIs can augment current rehabilitation therpies by reinforcing and thereby increasing more ffective use of impaired brain areas and connecions.(69,70) Studies in stroke patients have shown hat, with a motor relearning intervention, EEG feaures change in parallel with improveme”
Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. (2005, background): “It remains to be determined whether the beneficial effects of tDCS of the affected hemisphere on JTT performance are mediated through stimulation of primary motor cortex alone (Nudo et al., 1990; Werhahn et al., 2003; Murase et al., 2004) or in combination with ipsilesional dorsal premotor cortex (L”
Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). (2017, background): “In particular, it has been proposed that in patients with left hemispheric damage, the homotopic contralateral right hemispheric areas may be in a state of abnormally high activation and may exert an inhibitory effect over the stroke-affected hemisphere (Belin et al., 1996; Murase et al., 2004).”
Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling (2010, neutral): “TMS experiments in chronic stroke patients indicate that contralesional M1 may exert an abnormally high inhibition on the ipsilesional motor cortex, thereby possibly contributing to the impaired motor function of the paretic hand (Murase et al., 2004).”
Resting Inter-hemispheric fMRI Connectivity Predicts Performance after Stroke (2009, background): “Similarly, in the somatomotor system, normal interhemispheric coherence is quite important for normal function.(7,35) A recent study using dynamic causal modeling of fMRI BOLD signal reported that subcortical strokes are associated with decrements in interhemispheric neuronal coupling at rest, incre”
Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect (2005, background): “The notion of competition between hemispheres and the negative influence of activity in the intact hemisphere is emerging as an important principle at the systems level to understand recovery of function, not only in spatial neglect, but also in studies of motor and language recover”
The plastic human brain cortex. (2005, background): “No such modulation in the cortical output maps was noted when maps were obtained before each daily practice session (Figure 1A).”
Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018) (2019, positive): “Based on the concept of stroke-induced dysbalanced interhemispheric interactions (Murase et al., 2004; Hummel and Cohen, 2006; Hummel et al., 2008; Volz et al., 2015), ‘‘excitatory” HFrTMS and iTBS protocols are meant to be applied over the lesioned hemisphere, but ‘‘inhibitory” LF-rTMS and cTBS…”
Dynamic intra- and interhemispheric interactions during unilateral and bilateral hand movements assessed with fMRI and DCM (2008, methodology): “In humans, the interhemispheric interaction of the M1 output has been studied extensively by means of TMS (Siebner et al., 2003).”
Dynamic causal modeling of cortical activity from the acute to the chronic stage after stroke (2011, neutral): “…to investigate the role of contralesional M1 for motor recovery because recent studies provided conflicting evidence for both promoting and inhibitory influences on ipsilesional M1 activity (Gerloff et al., 2006; Grefkes et al., 2008b; Lotze et al., 2006; Murase et al., 2004; Nowak et al., 2008).”
Clinical Applications of Brain-Computer Interfaces: Current State and Future Prospects (2009, background): “pies by reinforcing and thereby increasing effective use of impaired brain areas and connections [125], [126].”