Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect

By Maurizio Corbetta, M. Kincade, C. Lewis, Abraham Z. Snyder, A. Sapir. Nature Neuroscience, 2005

896 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c696c69b68a874cdbca14e8e156bb5dc57eefa07

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Modeling the Impact of Lesions in the Human Brain (2009, background): “Several empirical studies have demonstrated such non-local effects, for example changes a distributed pattern of functional connectivity following in patients with focal brain lesions due to tumor or stroke [33–35].”
Resting Inter-hemispheric fMRI Connectivity Predicts Performance after Stroke (2009, background): “Moreover, following damage to right hemisphere-dominant neural systems that result in spatial neglect, activation of left and right parietal regions is unbalanced, and interhemispheric functional connectivity in parietal cortex is decreased.(8,9) Resting state functional connectivity (FC) magnetic r”
Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. (2007, neutral): “Strokes that cause neglect often structurally damage the ventral network while sparing the dorsal network (Corbetta et al., 2005; Husain and Rorden, 2003; Malhotra et al., 2006a; Milner and McIntosh, 2005).”
Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications (2011, neutral): “Similar results have been described in post-stroke recovery from non-motor deficits such as neglect (Corbetta et al., 2005) and language (Rosen et al., 2000; Saur et al., 2006), though these rely on networks that are differently distributed as compared with the motor system (Raymer et al., 2008).”
Multisensory Stimulation in Stroke Rehabilitation (2012, background): “All patients received conventional speech and language therapy and all patients improved.”
Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery (2008, result): “Similar findings have also been described in language and right hemisphere attentional networks.(80) Consistent with this, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies of motor cortex and its efferents after stroke have generally found that cortical motor maps are smaller and corticospinal tract physio”
Why use a connectivity-based approach to study stroke and recovery of function? (2012, positive): “Task-based functional neuroimaging has been used to study recovery of function (Corbetta et al., 2005; Saur et al., 2006; Ward et al., 2003) and has provided important information on the patterns of functional reorganization post-stroke in several domains including motor (Loubinoux et al., 2003;…”
The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. (2008, neutral): “Moreveor, impaired interactions between the ventral and dorsal attention network (Corbetta et al., 2005; He et al., 2007a) produce activity imbalances in parietal spatial maps that result in a tonic attentional bias toward the ipsilesional field.”
Morphological Differences in the Parietal Lobes within the Human Genus (2010, background): “Hence, neglect can be hypothesized to be related to a structural dysfunction between the lower and upper parietal areas (Corbetta et al. 2005).”
Measuring and manipulating brain connectivity with resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) (2012, background): “(Corbetta et al., 2005; He et al., 2007), hemiparesis worsened by transcallosal inhibition (Carter et al., 2010; Duque et al., 2005; Grefkes et al., 2008; Murase et al., 2004), memory deficits in Alzheimer's due to distributed network pathology (Buckner et al., 2005), and depression associated with…”
Typologies of attentional networks (2006, background): “Research with patients with neglect has elucidated how attentional networks (for example, alerting and orienting) can interact to influence one anothe”
Neural mechanisms of understanding rational actions: middle temporal gyrus activation by contextual violation. (2011, background): “Brass et al. (2007) observed activation in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) and superior temporal gyrus (STG) when rationality of goal-directed action was violated.”