Does social class predict diet quality?

By N. Darmon, Adam Drewnowski. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2008

2,317 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/608e20be619789d819c6a25c5110d7fd33a06d79

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health

1. Adam Drewnowski
2. N. Darmon
3. Susanne Stoll-Kleemann
4. Uta Johanna Schmidt

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. N. Darmon
2. Adam Drewnowski
3. Barry M. Popkin
4. W. Kerr

Citations in the corpus

• Contribution of food prices and diet cost to socioeconomic disparities in diet quality and health: a systematic review and analysis (2015, background): “This suggestion is consistent with observations that low-quality diets are not restricted to poor people but are nevertheless more frequent in lower– as opposed to higher–socioeconomic status groups.(24,39) Inadequacy of food budgets in poverty”
• Do healthier foods and diet patterns cost more than less healthy options? A systematic review and meta-analysis (2013, neutral): “4 Many factors, including the availability and cultural acceptability of healthy foods, pose obstacles to the promotion of healthy diets.”
• American Cancer Society guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention (2002, background): “Even in neighborhoods where supermarkets are available, low-income residents may more frequently purchase a diet of less expensive, higher-calorie foods; studies have suggested that lower cost foods comprise a greater proportion of the diet of lower income individuals.(53) Studies also suggest that ”
• Food groups and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke and heart failure: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies (2019, neutral): “People with a high intake of whole grains, vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes or fi sh might have different lifestyles, or socioeconomic status compared to those with lower intakes, representing important confounders (Darmon and Drewnowski 2008).”
• Reducing meat consumption in developed and transition countries to counter climate change and biodiversity loss: a review of influence factors (2017, background): “Darmon and Drewnowski (2008) found that people of lower socioeconomic status (education, income and/or occupation) and more limited economic means follow less healthy diets, including larger quantities of fatty meats.”
• Eating out of home and its association with dietary intake: a systematic review of the evidence (2012, background): “It is well established that higher socioeconomic strata have better diets (44).”