The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts: Practitioners' beliefs about deception

By Leif A. Strömwall, Pär Anders Granhag, Maria Hartwig. 2004

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6045f4bcae603cf08d3614c5ea15adc3bbec96f6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Criminal versus HUMINT Interrogations: The Importance of Psychological Science to Improving Interrogative Practice (2010, unknown): “…or nonverbal cues to deception have been identified; those that have been found are far from perfectly discriminative, appear to vary across individuals and situations, and have received very little investigation outside studies with American subjects (see Bond & Rao, 2004; DePaulo et al., 2003).”
Processes underlying deception: an empirical analysis of truth and lies when manipulating the stakes (2005, background): “When they review the views held by practitioners (people working in the legal field) about cues to deception, Strömwall et al. (2004) conclude that, overall, practitioners did not differ in their beliefs from laypersons.”
Interrogating to detect deception and truth : effects of strategic use of evidence (2005, background): “…for these claims; instead, research suggests the cues reported in these manuals reflect common misconceptions about the 13 link between demeanor and deception that I discussed above (Akehurst, Köhnken, Vrij, & Bull, 1996; Strömwall & Granhag, 2003; Strömwall et al., 2004; Vrij & Semin, 1996).”
Nonverbal Dominance Versus Verbal Accuracy in Lie Detection (2008, background): “This is perhaps due to people’s having stereotypical beliefs about the behavior of liars rather than of truth tellers (e.g., liars lack eye contact and fidget) (Global Deception Team, 2006; Mann et al., 2004; Strömwall et al., 2004; Taylor & Hick, 2007; Vrij et al., 2006).”
‘Look into my eyes’: can an instruction to maintain eye contact facilitate lie detection? (2010, background): “However, rather than relying on details, observers typically rely heavily on eye contact when making veracity judgements and associate gaze aversion with deception (Strömwall et al., 2004; The Global Deception Research Team, 2006; Vrij, Akehurst, & Knight, 2006).”
Blinking During and After Lying (2008, background): “Research has demonstrated that lie detectors typically associate an increase in eye blinks with deception (Strömwall et al. 2004; Taylor and Hick 2007; Vrij et al. 2006a).”
Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. (2007, background): “Similar results have been reported in Sweden, with prison inmates holding more accurate stereotypes about indicators of deception (Stromwall et al., 2004).”