Processes underlying deception: an empirical analysis of truth and lies when manipulating the stakes

By Letizia Caso, Augusto Gnisci, Aldert Vrij, Samantha Mann. 2005

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/031df466bb7a12a6ab8d2db3619d0d811fb7c0bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Sharon Leal
2. Aldert Vrij
3. Jeffrey J. Walczyk
4. Maria Hartwig
5. Leanne ten Brinke
6. S. Porter
7. R. Fisher
8. Siegfried L. Sporer

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Sharon Leal
2. Aldert Vrij

In Social Psychology

1. Sharon Leal
2. Aldert Vrij
3. Jeffrey J. Walczyk
4. Maria Hartwig
5. S. Porter
6. Leanne ten Brinke
7. R. Fisher
8. Pär Anders Granhag

Citations in the corpus

• Blinking During and After Lying (2008, background): “…not only when lengthy, elaborative responses, were required (Granhag and Strömwall 2002; Hartwig et al. 2006; Strömwall et al. 2006; Vrij et al. 2001, 2006c; Vrij and Mann 2006; White and Burgoon 2001), but also when short responses were sufficient (Caso et al. 2005; Vrij et al. 1996, 2006c).”
• Cognitive Lie Detection: Response Time and Consistency of Answers as Cues to Deception (2009, background): “Researchers have also observed fewer eye blinks ( Caso et al. 2005 ) and other eye movements during deception (Pennebaker and Chew 1985).”