Nonverbal Dominance Versus Verbal Accuracy in Lie Detection

By Aldert Vrij. 2008

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e621570a47d6101474f06aa75a887c519cad9e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Pär Anders Granhag
2. Maria Hartwig
3. Leanne ten Brinke
4. S. Porter
5. Leif A. Strömwall
6. Aldert Vrij
7. R. Fisher
8. Michael G. Aamodt

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Pär Anders Granhag
2. S. Porter
3. Maria Hartwig
4. Leanne ten Brinke
5. Aldert Vrij
6. R. Fisher

In Social Psychology

1. Maria Hartwig
2. Pär Anders Granhag
3. Leanne ten Brinke
4. S. Porter
5. Leif A. Strömwall
6. Aldert Vrij
7. R. Fisher
8. Michael G. Aamodt

Citations in the corpus

• Impression and Information Management: On the Strategic Self- Regulation of Innocent and Guilty Suspects (2010, background): “, 2003; Kassin, 2008), differences in the challenges related to formulating the verbal statement of denial is likely to be a more fruitful avenue (Vrij, 2008; Vrij et al., 2008).”
• The truth about lies: What works in detecting high‐stakes deception? (2010, methodology): “Currently, a spotlight is shining upon neuroscientists who have begun to examine brain function using neuroimaging such as functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) as a means of detecting lies (see Iacono, 2008; Vrij, 2008a).”