Sectoral systems of innovation and production

By Franco Malerba. 2002

2,704 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5fbe31a3c6c44df33eb245f591f43a3c33b1fb66

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Innovation systems perspectives on developing-country agriculture: a critical review (2005, background): “, geographically determined) levels (Saxenian, 1994; Braczyk, Cooke, and Heidenreich, 1998; Fritsch, 2004), at different sectoral levels (Breschi and Malerba, 1997; Malerba, 2002), in different time periods”
Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts (2017, background): “Over the years, different variants of IS have been formulated and applied empirically, including a national (Lundvall, 1988), regional (Cooke et al., 1997), sectoral (Malerba, 2002) and technological (Carlsson and Stankiewicz, 1991) approach.”
Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector (2009, background): “Systems thinking in innovation studies has becomewidespread, inspired by approaches such as national, sectoral, and technical systems of innovation [1–3].”
The political economy of industrial policy: Structural interdependencies, policy alignment and conflict management (2019, background): “The National Systems of Innovation literature pioneered by Christopher Freeman, Bengt-Åke Lundvall and Richard Nelson pointed out the need to have explicit innovation policy on a number of grounds: infrastructural and institutional problems; technological lockin, path dependency, and transition fail”
The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems (2013, background): “, 1997), sectoral systems of innovation and production (Malerba, 2002) and”
Rural innovation systems and networks: findings from a study of Ethiopian smallholders (2011, background): “It may originate from foreign sources of discovery or emerge from the use or reorganization of internal and indigenous practices and behaviors (Clark 2002; Malerba 2002).”
Sectors and the additionality effects of R&D tax credits: A cross-country microeconometric analysis (2017, background): “One reason to expect cross-sectoral variation is that, as it has convincingly been shown in the field of innovation studies, sectors matter (Malerba, 2002).”
Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims (2009, background): “institutions and networks of agents involved in the generation, diffusion, and utilization of a specific technology fits best with their interest in technological change compared to the National Systems of Innovation approach [31,32] or the sectoral innovation [33] approach that both take a broader ”
Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification (2008, background): “The knowledge base and learning processes related to innovation differ across sectoral systems of innovation (Malerba, 2002).”
Intangible Capital and Firms Productivity (2011, neutral): “…sectoral boundaries defined in terms of similarity in techniques or demand we prefer to refer to the concept of sectoral systems of innovation (Malerba, 2002) making use of the taxonomy recently proposed by Castellacci (2008) which allows us to gather the individual manufacturing and service…”
THE INNOVATIONâ€ EMPLOYMENT NEXUS: A CRITICAL SURVEY OF THEORY AND EMPIRICS (2016, neutral): “A number of recent studies carry on analyses exclusively at industry level, focusing on the specificities of different technological regimes and sectoral systems of innovation (as conceptualized by Malerba, 2002 and Malerba and Orsenigo, 1993).”
Advances and Challenges in Innovation Studies (2005, background): “…(NIS) (Freeman 1987; Lundvall1992; Nelson 1993; Edquist 1997), regional innovation systems (RIS) (Cooke 1992; Braczyk et al. 1998), sectoral innovation systems (SIS) (Breschi and Malerba 1997; Malerba 2002, 2005), as well as the technological systems approach (Carlsson and Stankiewicz 1995).”
Technology transfer organizations: Services and business models (2013, background): “innovation for two important reasons (Dalziel (2010): First, this paper lays stress on this class of organization that is largely underdocumented and under-studied in empirical studies on innovation (Lundvall, 1992; Cooke et al., 2004; Malerba, 2002), in conceptual models (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff,”