Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures

658 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

More than just a brain: emotions and the doctoral experience (2013, background): “However, the researcher rejects an essentialised view of culture sometimes associated with ‘opportunistic and speculative forays into the available literature’ (Bond, Žegarac, & Spencer-Oatey, 2000, p. 47) to explain differences in behaviour.”
Pragmatics: An Advanced Resource Book for Students (2012, methodology): “…about the data-collection method of Discourse Completion Task (DCT), data collected for experimental pragmatics, and the application of historical corpus data to the study of historical pragmatics through the innovative research of Kasper (2000), van der Henst and Sperber (2004), and Kohnen (2009).”
Politeness and in-directness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests (2009, background): “…normative data, they reliably illustrate the pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic norms of the respondent’s culture (Beebe and Cummings 1996: 75; and Kasper 2000: 329) and provide valuable pragmatic input that can help the foreign language learner “approach the norms for the given L2 speech…”
Developing alternative frameworks for exploring intercultural learning: a critique of Hofstede's cultural difference model (2009, background): “First ‘group members are unlikely to share identical sets of attitudes, beliefs and so on but rather show family resemblance’ (Spencer-Oatey 2000, 5).”