Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies for English Language Learners: Comparison between Chinese and German College Students

By Chuang Wang, Götz Schwab, P. Fenn, Mei Chang. 2013

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Two hundred Chinese and 160 German college students completed two surveys about their self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies learning English in China and Germany. All participants took an English language test to measure their English proficiency. Cronbach’s alpha was used to check the internal consistency of the surveys, and confirmatory factor analysis was employed for the construct validity. Factorial invariance of the self-efficacy survey was tested between Chinese and German students. Both surveys turned out to be reliable and valid with satisfactory goodness-of-fit indices. The self-efficacy survey was found to have the same latent structure between Chinese and German students. The SRL strategy survey, however, was found to have a different latent structure. Mean differences between Chinese and German students were compared with multivariate analysis of variance, and relationships between self-efficacy, SRL strategies, and English proficiency were examined with structural equation modeling. Chinese students reported a lower level of self-efficacy beliefs but their English proficiency was not significantly different in comparison to German students. Their use of SRL strategies was not significantly different, either. Statistically significant relationships were noted between self-efficacy, use of SRL strategies, and English language test scores. Female students reported higher levels of self-efficacy beliefs but gained lower scores on the English language test in both countries. Implications of the results are discussed for English language instruction in both countries. Future studies are recommended to use the same English language test in two countries and to use a balanced sample between male and female students.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f69bdce6d1ed75a6bd2688388531184a41a4740

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

Citations in the corpus

A cross-cultural investigation on perseverance, self-regulated learning, motivation, and achievement (2019, background): “Numerous studies in both Western (Caprara et al. 2011; Joët, Usher, and Bressoux 2011) and non-Western contexts (Kim et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2013) have shown that self-efficacy is positively associated with academic outcomes.”
Self-efficacy, task values and growth mindset: what has the most predictive power for primary school students’ self-regulated learning in English writing and writing competence in an Asian Confucian cultural context? (2020, unknown): “Research has shown that English writing is the most challenging skill for ESL/EFL learners to acquire (Wang, Schwab, Fenn, & Chang, 2013).”
Examining the relationship between English language learners’ online self-regulation and their self-efficacy (2017, unknown): “Other researchers have also advocated using multidimensional questionnaires instead of general self-efficacy items to assess language learners’ self-efficacy (Pajares, 1996; Wang et al., 2013).”