Socially Desirable Response Tendencies in Survey Research

By Jan-Benedict E M Steenkamp, Martijn G. de Jong, H. Baumgartner. 2010

451 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f53c1d655811904e1d17ec77eb69d0edc232862

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

When does a social norm catch the worm? Disentangling social normative influences on sustainable consumption behaviour (2020, background): “While SDR scales prevail to control for social desirability biases in consumer behaviour literature (Steenkamp, de Jong, & Baumgartner, 2010), they are often contested because of difficulties in separating valid personality content in the SDR measures from the bias that they intend to measure due…”
Companies, Meet Ethical Consumers: Strategic CSR Management to Impact Consumer Choice (2019, methodology): “Following Steenkamp et al. (2010), 12 attitudinal questions on SD bias were taken from Paulhus’ (2002) moralistic response tendencies scale.”
Material Parenting: How the Use of Goods in Parenting Fosters Materialism in the Next Generation (2015, background): “, less likely to lie, steal, or break the law), in situations where data collection is anonymous, the SDR correlation with materialism most likely represents shared variance in these two constructs rather than bias, and statistical adjustment due to SDR is unwarranted (Steenkamp et al. 2010).”
Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies (2015, unknown): “For example answers and the extent to which the measurement conditions make those consequences salient (see Paulhus 1984, Steenkamp et al. 2010 m 04 02 / 14 . o r p The more serious the social consequences of is likely to be.”
When Wanting Is Better than Having: Materialism, Transformation Expectations, and Product-Evoked Emotions in the Purchase Process (2013, background): “, less likely to lie, steal, or break the law) and because data collection was anonymous, the SDR correlation with materialism most likely represents shared variance in these two constructs rather than bias, and statistical adjustment due to SDR is unwarranted (Steenkamp et al. 2010).”
Global Versus Local Consumer Culture: Theory, Measurement, and Future Research Directions (2019, background): “Concerning the newly added variables, people with high ALCC are more 1 See Steenkamp and Maydeu-Olivares (2015) and Steenkamp, De Jong, and Baumgartner (2010) for references to these scales. agreeable, a finding consistent with that of Westjohn, Singh, and Magnusson (2012).”