Open robot control software: the OROCOS project
By Herman P. J. Bruyninckx. Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164), 2001
722 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Development
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ee8accc7f60d90122641d8f59d52cf5b78b30c4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Abhinav Kumar Gupta
- Lerrel Pinto
- Sergey Levine
- Dhiraj Gandhi
- Saurabh Gupta
- Adithyavairavan Murali
- Pieter Abbeel
- Chelsea Finn
In Development
- David Coleman
- Saurabh Gupta
- Adithyavairavan Murali
- Abhinav Kumar Gupta
- Stefan Kohlbrecher
- Sachin Chitta
- Matthias Scheutz
- Johannes Meyer
Citations in the corpus
- Analysis and Observations From the First Amazon Picking Challenge (2016, neutral): “Software packages used by the teams include the “Rigid Body Dynamics Library” (RBDL) [26], OROCOS with its “Kinematics Dynamics Library” (KDL) [27], “Drake” [20], “EusLisp” [28] and “Klamp’t” [29].”
- Comprehensive Simulation of Quadrotor UAVs Using ROS and Gazebo (2012, methodology): “It is based on the Open Robot Control Software (Orocos) toolchain [6], which provides interfaces to ROS and executes tasks satisfying hard realtime constraints on the onboard PC system.”
- PyRobot: An Open-source Robotics Framework for Research and Benchmarking (2019, methodology): “MoveIt! [20], OMPL [59] which provide hardware-agnostic core functionalities that can be compiled for each specific robot. In the likes of ROS, there have also been robotics ecosystems, such as OROCOS [18] and the Microsoft Robotics Studio that support kinematic libraries, distributed processes, stat”
- Reducing the Barrier to Entry of Complex Robotic Software: a MoveIt! Case Study (2014, methodology): “[2] and OROCOS [3] continues to increase [4], and the required breadth of knowledge for understanding the deep stack of software from control drivers to high level planners is becoming more daunting.”
- Development environments for autonomous mobile robots: A survey (2007, background): “To our knowledge, this requirement is not met by Orocos (Bruyninckx, 2001; OROCOS, 2005), The Rossum Project (Lucas, 2004), Nomadic (Sprouse, 2005), Dave’s Robotic Operating System (Austin, 2004), the Open Automation Project (Walters, 2003), or YARP (Metta et al.”