Incorporating Resilience in the Assessment of Inclusive Wealth: An Example from South East Australia

By B. Walker, L. Pearson, M. Harris, K. Maler, C. Li, Reinette Biggs, T. Baynes. 2010

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e63073543e34e0d1ac9645c0461eef240f2bfe1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments (2011, background): “Walker et al. (2010) provides an empirical application of Mäler’s resilience approach examining the value to agriculture in South-East Australia of maintaining a saline free water table (mainly through farmers cutting down trees to expand agriculture).”
Reconnecting to the Biosphere (2011, background): “This has motivated attempts to capture the concept of resilience in environmental accounting (Walker et al. 2010) and regime shifts in models of renewable resource exploitation (Polasky et al. 2011b).”
National Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Assets and Their Services (2015, background): “However, the relationship between the asset condition and the capacity of the ecosystem to generate specific services may be dynamic and non-linear (e.g. Scheffer et al. 2002; Walker et al. 2010).”
Recent advances in the valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity (2012, background): “Walker et al. (2010) look at the value of this resilience to agriculture in south-east Australia in terms of maintaining a saline-free water table (salinity problems are caused mainly through farmers cutting down trees to expand agriculture).”
Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative (2010, background): “Four different types of non-linear relations are possible [37] (Figure 1 and Box 1).”
An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social–ecological dynamics (2014, background): “For assessing capacity for learning, we adapt Li et al.’s (2008) construct of learning capability, and we also draw on Watkins and Marsick (1997), Milestad (2003), Jerez-Gómez et al. (2005) as well as Rist et al.’s (2006) dimensions of social learning processes: a. Knowledge of threats and…”
Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique (2011, background): “Recently there have been some efforts to deal with ecological non-linearity in ecosystem service valuation, for instance by modelling non-convexities of coupled ecological-economic systems (Dasgupta and Mäler, 2004), or by measuring the ‘insurance’ service provided by a natural asset when close to a”