Recent advances in the valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The value of green walls to urban biodiversity (2017, background): “These multiple roles are associated with multiple benefits (and multiple beneficiaries), which makes monetary valuation of biodiversity challenging (Atkinson et al., 2012), especially when the processes and functions leading to benefits are interdependent and non-linear.”
Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: A critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity (2015, background): “, in respect to the question whether biodiversity is regarded as the source of ecosystem services or not (Atkinson et al., 2012; Elmqvist et al., 2010; Mace et al., 2012).”
Soil “Ecosystem” Services and Natural Capital: Critical Appraisal of Research on Uncertain Ground (2016, background): “The claim is often made, for example by Atkinson et al. (2012), that the market economy affords “powerful means of communicating the importance of conservation to a wider (and previously unreceptive) audience.””
The Politics of Sustainability and Development (2016, background): “This has provided a scientific backdrop for work on natural capital accounting and climate change (24) or biodiversity and ecosystem valuation (25).”