The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm).

By Risto Näätänen. Psychophysiology, 2001

724 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5dd6b0c854cd3d9edb5274d4573c1a07b9857500

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Patricia K. Kuhl
2. Cyma K Van Petten
3. Jonathan R. Folstein
4. Véronique Boulenger
5. Fanny Meunier
6. Michel Hoen
7. Caroline Jacquier
8. Petri Paavilainen

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Patricia K. Kuhl
2. Paul Iverson
3. Cyma K Van Petten
4. Jonathan R. Folstein
5. Véronique Boulenger
6. Michel Hoen
7. Caroline Jacquier
8. Fanny Meunier

In Signal Processing

1. Cyma K Van Petten
2. Jonathan R. Folstein
3. Véronique Boulenger
4. Michel Hoen
5. Caroline Jacquier
6. Fanny Meunier
7. Zhanao Fu
8. Jessamyn Schertz

Citations in the corpus

• Interplay between acoustic/phonetic and semantic processes during spoken sentence comprehension: an ERP study. (2011, positive): “Such a finding suggests that the early negativity we observed in response to manipulated words may reflect fine-discrimination capabilities, regularity and automaticity in the response mechanism that are highly consistent with an MMN interpretation (Näätänen, 2001).”
• A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. (2003, methodology): “The changes in perception due to language experience are almost certainly speech-specific, and thus can be considered, by definition, to be phonetic rather than purely auditory (see Diesch, Biermann, & Luce, 1998; Näätänen, 2001; Sharma & Dorman, 2000; Winkler et al., 1999).”
• The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. (2007, background): “As this invariance can involve no level of any acoustical feature per se, then it probably is of relational nature, i.e., the phoneme identity might be based on fixed relations or ratios between the different levels of certain acoustic features (Näätänen, 2001).”
• Electrophysiological correlates of second language processing (2005, neutral): “Elicitation of the MMN does not require participants to listen actively to the stimulus, and has been interpreted as an index of pre-attentive processes (for review, see Näätänen, 2001).”
• Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. (2007, methodology): “We thus focus on the visual modality here, with auditory studies noted only as background (for reviews of the MMN, see Näätänen, 2001; Näätänen & Alho, 1997; Ritter, Deacon, Gomes, Javitt, & Vaughan, 1995).”
• Unified Coding of Spectral and Temporal Phonetic Cues: Electrophysiological Evidence for Abstract Phonological Features (2021, background): “It is important to note that standard–deviant designs entail a matching procedure of the upcoming physical stimulus with an auditory memory representation (Näätänen & Kreegipuu, 2012; Näätänen, Jacobsen, & Winkler, 2005; Näätänen, 2001).”