Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans

By John J. Foxe, G. V. Simpson. Experimental Brain Research, 2001

680 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5dd111d69adc2b2b7184da3cb6a0bc33307f039a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. (2004, background): “, 2000) are likely due to low-level features (VanRullen and Thorpe, 2001), consistent with the findings that only the C1 component, which starts around 50 ms, reflects activity in V1 (Di Russo et al., 2001; Foxe and Simpson, 2002), an area sensitive to lowlevel features.”
SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. (2005, background): “Because of an eye-to-brain lag of approximately 50 ms (e.g., Foxe & Simpson, 2002; see also Reichle et al., 2003), preprocessing is interrupted for the duration of the saccade with a temporal delay of 50 ms (for both onset and offset of the saccade).17 Because lexical completion should not depend…”
The Limits of Feedforward Vision: Recurrent Processing Promotes Robust Object Recognition when Objects Are Degraded (2012, background): “In accordance with this latter view, recent reports have cited recurrent processing effects occurring as early as 100– 150 msec (Koivisto, Railo, Revonsuo, Vanni, & Salminen- Vaparanta, 2011; Roland, 2010; Bar et al., 2006; Foxe & Simpson, 2002; Lamme & Roelfsema, 2000).”
Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: visual processing speed revisited. (2006, background): “It is likely that the Wrst wave of processing , while suY - cient to trigger useful behavioural responses , is just the start of a series of complex events involving feedback loops to earlier visual areas ( Foxe & Simpson , 2002 ; Hamker , 2003 ; Moore & Armstrong , 2003 ) .”
Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. (2004, background): “…be noted, however, that while the use of broadly defined component peaks is a good means of limiting the number of statistical tests that are conducted, these components often represent the activity of many simultaneously active brain generators at any given moment (e.g. Foxe and Simpson, 2002).”
EEG source imaging. (2004, background): “Concerning ERPs, different scalp sites have different peak latencies (and thus several generators), particularly for prototypical components (for detailed discussion see Skrandies, 2003; see also e.g. Foxe and Simpson, 2002; Murray et al., 2002; Picton et al., 2000).”
E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading (2006, methodology): “Several recent experiments using physiological methods have given consistent estimates of the duration of the ''eye-to-brain'' lag: approximately 50 ms (Clark, Fan, & Hillard, 1995; Foxe & Simpson, 2002; Mouchetant-Rostaing, Giard, Bentin, Aguera, & Pernier , 2000; Van Rullen & Thorpe, 2001).”
Masking Disrupts Reentrant Processing in Human Visual Cortex (2007, background): “The notion of several reentrant or recurrent loops at multiple levels is highly likely given the temporal dynamics of cortical processing (e.g., Foxe & Simpson, 2002).”
Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition (2013, neutral): “Both the”