N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs.
By Roxane J. Itier, Margot J. Taylor. Cerebral Cortex, 2004
687 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0593a60df1b2f647fd11226b32e3c808c1bc37d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Bruno Rossion
- Gilles Pourtois
- Gillian Rhodes
- Romina Palermo
- Corentin Jacques
- James W. Tanaka
- Patrik Vuilleumier
- Gary Lupyan
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Bruno Rossion
- James W. Tanaka
- Patrik Vuilleumier
- Gillian Rhodes
- Romina Palermo
- Gilles Pourtois
- Corentin Jacques
- Gary Lupyan
Citations in the corpus
- Three Stages of Facial Expression Processing: ERP Study with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (2009, background): “Numerous event-related potential (ERP) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) studies (Bentin et al., 1996; Jeffreys, 1996; Eimer and McCarthy, 1999; Eimer, 2000; Liu et al., 2000, 2002; Itier and Taylor, 2004; Xu et al., 2005; Itier et al., 2006) have investigated the time course of face visual processin”
- Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170 (2008, background): “…vs. faces… e.g. Bentin et al., 1996; Botzel et al., 1995; Carmel and Bentin, 2002; Eimer, 1998, 2000a,b; Goffaux et al., 2003; Itier et al., 2006; Itier and Taylor, 2004a; Jeffreys, 1996; Philiastides and Sajda, 2006; Rossion et al., 2000, 2003; Rousselet et al., 2005, 2007, 2004a; ZionGolumbic…”
- Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact. (2007, background): “ERPs maximally responsive to faces at around 170 ms (labeled as an N170 or N1) are also seen for non-face objects and words, although often with reduced amplitude and increased latency (Bentin & Carmel, 2002; Itier & Taylor, 2004; but see Rossion, Curran, & Gauthier, 2002).”
- Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox (2010, positive): “In general, when using different stimuli across conditions, one has to be careful to disentangle low-level and high-level factors (Frund, Busch, Korner, Schadow, & Herrmann, 2007; Itier & Taylor, 2004; Luck, 2005; Rousselet, Mace, Thorpe, & Fabre-Thorpe, 2007; Sadr & Sinha, 2001, 2004; VanRullen &”
- Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. (2007, background): “…of these different emporal manifestations in the EEG (or MEG) are still uncertain. t n v t ychologia 45 (2007) 174–194 Albeit not undisputed (e.g., Itier & Taylor, 2004; Liu et l., 2002; Pegna, Khateb, Michel, & Landis, 2004), it is usully assumed that specialized neural systems in human…”