Testing for Consistency in Contingent Ranking Experiments
By Vivien Foster, S. Mourato. 2002
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d69bb12e967bb1fcba05d5844dcb490479d80a0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Riccardo Scarpa
- Stephane Hess
- John M. Rose
- D. Campbell
- David A. Hensher
- W. Hutchinson
- G. Atkinson
- S. B. Olsen
In General Decision Sciences
- Stephane Hess
- Riccardo Scarpa
- John M. Rose
- David A. Hensher
- D. Campbell
- Oluwole Peter Akadiri
- Jordan J. Louviere
- D. Pearce
In Safety Research
- Oluwole Peter Akadiri
- Jordan J. Louviere
- Ian J. Bateman
- G. Atkinson
- D. Campbell
- Riccardo Scarpa
- W. Hutchinson
- D. Pearce
Citations in the corpus
- Development of a multi-criteria approach for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects (2011, methodology): “Stated preference methods Contingent valuation method It is a direct valuation method which determines a value by surveying people's `willingness to pay' for an environmental gain or `willingness to accept' compensation for a loss on a hypothetical market scenario (Cameron and Englin, 1997; Harding,”
- Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments (2006, methodology): “If IIA holds, then the model estimated on all choices should be the same as that estimated for a sub-set of alternatives (see Foster and Mourato, 2002, for an example).”
- Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis (2008, background): “However, 324 Atkinson · Mourato A nn u.”
- Ordering effects and choice set awareness in repeat-response stated preference studies (2012, background): “[23,12]) and in real purchasing behavior (e.”
- Non-trading, lexicographic and inconsistent behaviour in stated choice data (2010, background): “…where over the course of the experiment, a respondent evaluates the alternatives on the basis of a subset of attributes (see e.g., Blume et al. 2006; Campbell et al. 2006; Deshazo and Fermo 2002; Foster and Mourato 2002; Rekola 2003; Rosenberger et al. 2003; Sælensminde 2001, 2002; Spash 2000).”
- Benefit Estimates for Landscape Improvements: Sequential Bayesian Design and Respondents’ Rationality in a Choice Experiment (2005, methodology): “Results from previous research (Johnson and Matthews 2001; Foster and Mourato 2002; San Miguel, Ryan, and Amaya-Amaya 2005) led to suggestions that identification of irrational respondents is desirable to test sensitivity of WTP estimates to violations of economic theory.”
- A push to cycling—exploring the e-bike's role in overcoming barriers to bicycle use with a survey and an intervention study (2017, unknown): “Despite this, consumer WTP exhibits some level of consistency across studies and between elicitation methods (Fearnley et al. 2008; Foster & Mourato, 2002; Veisten, 2007).”