Institutional Ownership Differences and International Diversification: The Effects of Boards of Directors and Technological Opportunity

By Laszlo Tihanyi, Richard A. Johnson, R. Hoskisson, Michael A. Hitt. 2003

505 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5caceb9dea084c780e58fcea615a0d0efc18f9e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

Citations in the corpus

Institutional Investors and Institutional Environment: A Comparative Analysis and Review (2010, background): “Hoskisson et al. (2002) and Tihanyi et al. (2003) follow a similar logic when they classify professional investment funds as short-term investors and pension funds as long-term investors based on the liquidity requirements of these different types of investors.”
Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity: Insights from Asia Pacific (2017, background): “Therefore, we are confident our results are not subject to multicollinearity concerns (Tihanyi et al., 2003).”
The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: the effect of family management, human capital and foreign ownership (2010, background): “For example, Tihanyi et al. (2003) find a significant relationship between institutional ownership by professional investment funds and international diversification in a sample of large US firms.”
Ownership of Corporations (2016, result): “Similar conclusions have been reached for business groups from different industries (Bhaumik et al., 2010) and for the interaction between insider ownership and institutional investors (George, Wiklund, & Zahra, 2005; Tihanyi et al., 2003).”
International Diversification (2012, background): “2000) and that higher proportions of outside directors tend to be associated with higher levels of internationalisation since outside directors enhance understanding of foreign markets (ellstrand et al. 2002; tihanyi et al. 2003).”
Minding the Gap (2016, background): “…are focused on institutional owners with at least 1% equity in any of the focal firms during our sampling window, a criterion that is commonly applied in governance research to remove the effects of marginal equity holders (Hoskisson et al., 2002; Johnson & Greening, 1999; Tihanyi et al., 2003).”