Deconstructing the McGurk-MacDonald illusion.

By Salvador Soto-Faraco, Agnès Alsius. 2009

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sensory Systems

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “Specifically, this window is wider in the condition where the visual leading auditory stimulus than vice versa (Massaro and Cohen, 1993; Munhall et al., 1996; Jones and Jarick, 2006; van Wassenhove et al., 2007; Soto-Faraco and Alsius, 2009)8.”
Developmental changes in the multisensory temporal binding window persist into adolescence (2012, methodology): “Moreover, a study by Soto-Faraco and Alsius (2009) showed discrepancies in the size of the temporal windows measured on asynchrony detection and speech identification tasks performed using the same stimuli, suggesting that task plays an important role in delimiting the window (but see van…”
Perception of intersensory synchrony: A tutorial review (2010, unknown): “…with the original mouth movements (McGrath & Summerfield, 1985), but the effect survives, even if audition lagged vision by 180 msec (see also Soto-Faraco & Alsius, 2007, 2009; these studies show that participants can still perceive a McGurk effect when they can quite reliably perform TOJs…”
Perception of intersensory synchrony in audiovisual speech: not that special. (2011, background): “Some authors, though have reported that – at least on some occasions – an auditory /da/ and a lipread /ba/ are perceived as an integrated event ‘bda’, whereas the two components of this blend were frequently judged as being nonsimultaneous (Soto-Faraco & Alsius, 2009).”
A Psychophysical Investigation of Differences between Synchrony and Temporal Order Judgments (2013, result): “Using the same stimuli and participants, our results confirm what previous studies have found using different experiments and participants, showing that TIWs for speech are wider during TOJs than SJs [17,18].”
Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect. (2012, background): “Various data show that a subject is both able to perceive and estimate the discrepancy between the sight and the sound of a speaking face, and to however fuse the two inputs into a single percept (Manuel et al., 1989; Summerfield and McGrath, 1984; Soto-Faraco and Alsius, 2007, 2009).”
The temporal binding window for audiovisual speech: Children are like little adults (2016, background): “Auditory tokens were embedded in white noise to degrade the salience of the recordings and thereby increase the frequency of McGurk illusion perception (Soto-Faraco & Alsius, 2009; Sumby & Pollack, 1954).”