Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect.

By Olha Nahorna, Frédéric Berthommier, Jean-Luc Schwartz. 2012

79 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “For example, people demonstrated a larger McGurk effect if they had heard a series of audiovisual speech stimuli that were congruent rather than incongruent (Nahorna et al., 2012).”
Audio-Visual Scene Analysis with Self-Supervised Multisensory Features (2018, background): “For example, the McGurk effect is less effective when the viewer ﬁrst watches a video where audio and visuals in a video are unrelated, as this causes the signals to become “unbound” (i.e. not grouped together) [9,10].”
Audio-visual speech scene analysis: characterization of the dynamics of unbinding and rebinding the McGurk effect. (2015, methodology): “The paradigm was quite 260 similar to the one used in Nahorna et al. (2012), consisting in online monitoring of 261 congruent and incongruent McGurk targets embedded in a coherent or incoherent 262 context.”
The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing (2016, background): “On the other hand, exposure to as few as five successive presentations of phonetically 1 3 incoherent (e.g. “ra-ka”) AV syllables presented before the McGurk (“da”) syllable can substantially reduce the prevalence of the illusion (Nahorna et al. 2012).”
How prior expectations shape multisensory perception (2016, background): “…temporal sulcus involved in binding sensory signals predominantly in a bottom-up automatic fashion depending on their relative sensoryweights and (ii) higher order prefrontal cortices arbitrating between information integration and segregation in multisensory perception (see Nahorna et al., 2012).”