Perception of intersensory synchrony in audiovisual speech: not that special.

By Jean H. M. Vroomen, Jeroen J. Stekelenburg. 2011

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sensory Systems

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, neutral): “Before accepting the undoubtedly controversial claim that speech really is ‘special’ (see also Saldaña and Rosenblum, 1993; Tuomainen et al., 2005; though see Rosenblum, 2008; Vroomen and Stekelenburg, 2011), a number of alternative explanations for these null results need to be ruled out first.”
Intersensory binding across space and time: A tutorial review (2013, background): “…and Keetels (2006) Visual TOJ Role of auditory grouping Auditory grouping precedes intersensory binding Keetels et al. (2007) AV-TOJ Role of cross-modal correspondence Poor JNDs for audiovisual congruent speech Vatakis et al. (2008) AV-TOJ Role of cross-modal correspondence Poor JNDs for congruent…”
Music expertise shapes audiovisual temporal integration windows for speech, sinewave speech, and music (2014, background): “…sinewave speech are identical in the visual facial movements and linguistic representations, but differ in their spectrotemporal structure of the auditory input (Remez et al., 1981; Lee and Noppeney, 2011b; Vroomen and Stekelenburg, 2011; Stekelenburg and Vroomen, 2012; Baart et al., 2014).”
A Psychophysical Investigation of Differences between Synchrony and Temporal Order Judgments (2013, methodology): “Therefore, using these multiple stimulus types also enabled us to investigate a possible confound in previous work [2,3,9,10]: differences between the tasks highlighted using only Synchrony and Temporal Order Judgments”