The political economy of CSR in Western Europe
By A. Midttun, Kristian Gautesen, Maria Gjølberg. 2006
229 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b48ed354848671a5425202a6a470e835b44a9c1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
In Public Administration
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing non-financial reports according to the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines: evidence from Greece (2010, background): “This was already identified by Midttun et al. (2006) who examined the CSR engagement of Western economies and indicated that the Greek industrial sector ranked far lower than the other Mediterranean countries in terms of non-financial reporting and the adoption of voluntary standards.”
- Corporate Social Responsibility: One Size Does Not Fit All. Collecting Evidence from Europe (2009, background): “or North American model (and also with other regional models: Asia, Africa, Latin America, etc.); for example: Adams, Hill and Roberts (1998), Habisch, Jonker, Wegner, and Schmidpeter (2005), Maignan and Ralston (2002), Matten and Moon (2008), Midttun, Gautesen, and Gjolberg (2006) , Welford (2003,”
- Government Policies for Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe: Support and Institutionalization (2013, unknown): “We suggest, that these interpretations may be overly didactic to account for CSR policies and note with Aguilera et al (2007) and Midttun et al (2006) that although governments and companies operate in environments which are structured, actors, including governments, retain some choice.”
- Scandinavian Cooperative Advantage: The Theory and Practice of Stakeholder Engagement in Scandinavia (2015, background): “2003; Strand 2009; Vallentin and Murillo 2010); embeddedness of economic interests within broader societal interests (Maccoby 1991; Midttun et al. 2006); strong regulatory bodies and active nongov-”
- Corporate responsibility: Reflections on context and consequences (2009, background): “Nevertheless, despite increasing empirical evidence pointing to the effects of national, cultural, industrial and social contexts on different sorts of responsibility from companies (Midttun et al. 2006; Simpson and Kohers 2002), much of the research on CR continues to frame corporate responsibility”
- ‘Free Us Up So We Can Be Responsible!’ The Co-Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Neo-Liberalism in the UK, 1977-2010 (2012, background): “A growing literature does address CSR’s institutional determinants (Campbell, 2006; Midttun et al., 2006; Matten and Moon, 2008; Gjølberg, 2009; Jackson and Apostolakou, 2010) as well as its historical evolution (Frederick, 2006; Carroll, 2008; Moon et al., 2010).”