Me and my 400 friends: the anatomy of college students' Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being.

By A. Manago, T. Taylor, Patricia M. Greenfield. Developmental Psychology, 2012

619 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Is there a trade-off between having large networks of social connections on social networking sites such as Facebook and the development of intimacy and social support among today's generation of emerging adults? To understand the socialization context of Facebook during the transition to adulthood, an online survey was distributed to college students at a large urban university; participants answered questions about their relationships by systematically sampling their Facebook contacts while viewing their Facebook profiles online. Results confirmed that Facebook facilitates expansive social networks that grow disproportionately through distant kinds of relationship (acquaintances and activity connections), while also expanding the number of close relationships and stranger relationships, albeit at slower rates. Those with larger networks estimated that larger numbers of contacts in their networks were observing their status updates, a form of public communication to one's entire contact list. The major function of status updates was emotional disclosure, the key feature of intimacy. This finding indicates the transformation of the nature of intimacy in the environment of a social network site. In addition, larger networks and larger estimated audiences predicted higher levels of life satisfaction and perceived social support on Facebook. These findings emphasize the psychological importance of audience in the Facebook environment. Findings also suggest that social networking sites help youth to satisfy enduring human psychosocial needs for permanent relations in a geographically mobile world--college students with higher proportions of maintained contacts from the past (primarily high school friends) perceived Facebook as a more useful tool for procuring social support.

Subfields: Communication, Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b16d3df9b3551bff848892215ba95040ec33615

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

  1. Leonard Reinecke
  2. Eline Frison
  3. Steven Eggermont
  4. Tobias Dienlin
  5. Vegard Tveito
  6. J. Olson
  7. Andreas Eckhardt
  8. Tim Weitzel

In Education

  1. Eline Frison
  2. Steven Eggermont
  3. J. Olson
  4. Andreas Eckhardt
  5. Tim Weitzel
  6. Sven Laumer
  7. John Jonides
  8. Ethan Kross

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Christian Maier
  2. Sven Laumer
  3. Tim Weitzel
  4. Jih-Hsuan Tammy Lin
  5. Leonard Reinecke
  6. Eline Frison
  7. Steven Eggermont
  8. Tobias Dienlin

Citations in the corpus