Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process.
By Barbara M. Byrne. Psicothema, 2008
784 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ac8f8b253dd2e60de6167f7d548ef6fc7c09fb5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- R. Imhoff
- M. Gunkel
- Barbara M. Byrne
- T. Oakland
- Deana Desa
- Frederick T. L. Leong
- Dejun Kong
- Christopher Schlaegel
Citations in the corpus
- Development and Validation of the Social Emotional Competence Questionnaire (SECQ) (2012, methodology): “Meanwhile, the RMSEA values less than .05 indicate good fit, with values as high as .08 representing reasonable errors of approximation in the population (Browne & Cudeck, 1993; Byrne, 2008).”
- [International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation: second edition]. (2013, unknown): “Cabe reseñar los desarrollos metodológicos y técnicos en el establecimiento de la equivalencia intercultural (Byrne, 2008; Elosua, 2005), así como una mayor toma de conciencia sobre la importancia de los estudios analítico-racionales durante el proceso de adaptación, solo por citar un par de…”
- Cultural values, emotional intelligence, and conflict handling styles: A global study (2016, methodology): “We followed the recommendations in the literature (Byrne, 2008; Byrne & van De Vijver, 2010; Hult et al., 2008) and conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for each cultural cluster independently to assess the reliability and validity of all constructs and to obtain the best fitting measurement”
- Systematic review of psychometric proprieties of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale Version 11 (BIS-11). (2012, unknown): “Byrne (2008) has emphasized how important is to take account into cultural issues in instruments adaptation.”
- Value Orientations From the World Values Survey (2016, background): “7 To establish cross-national invariance formally, it is important that the same model fits all the countries well, that is, that the same configurations of salient and non-salient variables are found in all groups (Byrne, 2008; Davidov et al., 2014).”
- A critical analysis of cross-cultural research and testing practices: Implications for improved education and training in psychology (2009, background): “Cheung, Leong, & Ben-Porath, 2003). Similar problems are found in cross-cultural research that uses tests or scales developed in English and then translated into different languages. In this regard, most cross-cultural studies mention only the use of back translation, a technique that is not conside”
- Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire (2013, background): “The focus here was on the invariant operation of the items and, in particular, on equivalent factor loadings across groups (Byrne, 2008, 2010).”
- Evaluating Measurement Invariance of TALIS 2013 Complex Scales: Comparison between Continuous and Categorical Multiple-Group Confirmatory Factor Analyses (2014, methodology): “…less than 0.08; Standardised Root Mean Square Residual less than 0.06; and Weighted Root-Mean-Square Residual less than 0.90, that is: CFI ≥ 0.90, TLI ≥ 0.90, RMSEA ≤ 0.08, SRMR ≤ 0.06 and WRMR ≤ 0.90 (Yu, 2002; MacCallum et al., 1996; Byrne, 2008; Hu and Bentler, 1998, 1999; Steiger, 1990).”
- Promoting harmonious work passion among unmotivated employees: A two-nation investigation of the compensatory function of cooperative psychological climate (2018, background): “…of the measurement model comprising eight latent factors – supervisor autonomy support, extrinsic motivation, intrinsic motivation, cooperative psychological climate, harmonious passion, obsessive passion, task performance, and interpersonal helping –and their respective indicators (Byrne, 2008).”