Shame and Embarrassment Revisited

By J. Sabini, B. Garvey, A. Hall. 2001

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ac69424558e08e5f89edba8b291fb10d545dbc8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Joseph P. Forgas
2. Paul Slovic
3. P. McCarthy

In Social Psychology

1. Joseph P. Forgas
2. Rebekah East
3. C. Unkelbach
4. Su-fen Chiu
5. Chien‐Cheng Chen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Joseph P. Forgas
2. Rebekah East
3. Su-fen Chiu
4. Chien‐Cheng Chen

Citations in the corpus

• Affect in Social Thinking and Behavior (2006, background): “In addition, in shame the person believes that the flaw he or she is concerned about revealing is real and reflects a true shortcoming in his or her character, whereas in embarrassment the person views the perceived flaw as something that might lower his or her esteem in the eyes of observers, but w”